Allergic contact dermatitis in the hamster and in other rodents.

作者: Henry C. Maguire

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-0495-2_6

关键词:

摘要: The first, and for a long time the only, experimental animal study of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) was guinea pig (1). Thus basic studies that related sensitization potential to ability low molecular weight allergen couple protein, established requirement viable lymphoid cells (not sera) passive transfer hypersensitivity simple chemical allergens, demonstrated induction specific immunological unresponsiveness were done in (2,3, 4,5). Indeed, still remains choice identification allergens man (6,7). In 1968, technique measuring increased ear thickness as way assessing induced inflammation by mouse introduced (8); contrast pig, inflammatory skin reactions on flank are difficult evaluate since these lack both erythema easily defined induration. recently has been extended hamster (9,10) we using same methodology ACD rats (11). This report examines relates it other species.

参考文章(22)
J. L. Turk, L. W. Poulter, Darien Parker, Functional aspects of the selective depletion of lymphoid tissue by cyclophosphamide. Immunology. ,vol. 23, pp. 493- 501 ,(1972)
A A Glynn, C S Easmon, Effect of cyclophosphamide on delayed hypersensitivity to Staphylococcus aureus in mice. Immunology. ,vol. 33, pp. 767- ,(1977)
Albert M. Kligman, Bertil Magnusson, Allergic contact dermatitis in the guinea pig : identifications of contact allergens C. C. Thomas. ,(1970)
S Thompson, J W Streilein, S Sullivan, Contact hypersensitivity, humoral immunity, and specific unresponsiveness can be induced in Syrian hamsters with simple haptens. Journal of Immunology. ,vol. 124, pp. 577- 585 ,(1980)
K Himeno, S Yoshida, K Nomoto, K Takeya, Immune response to syngeneic or autologous testicular cells in mice. I. Augmented delayed footpad reaction in cyclophosphamide-treated mice. Clinical and Experimental Immunology. ,vol. 38, pp. 211- ,(1979)
MARION B. SULZBERGER, HYPERSENSITIVENESS TO ARSPHENAMINE IN GUINEA-PIGS Archives of Dermatology and Syphilology. ,vol. 20, pp. 669- 697 ,(1929) , 10.1001/ARCHDERM.1929.01440050079007