Comparison of different stimulation protocols used in in vitro fertilization: a review.

作者: Xiaolin La , Deekshya Shrestha , Huai L. Feng

DOI: 10.3978/J.ISSN.2305-5839.2015.04.09

关键词:

摘要: Infertility is one of the major medical problems in western world caused by genetic or epigenetic factors, both, which has led to continuous research and advancements field assisted reproductive technology (ART). Many stimulation protocols are available for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) vitro fertilization (IVF). This review compares agonist long protocol, antagonist protocol minimal protocol. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) shorter duration treatment less gonadotropin use. GnRH better folliculogenesis pregnancy rate, imperative goal COH. Despite its costly lengthy approach, delivered satisfactory results most women. On other hand, patients with poor reserve may have greater advantage when considering Evidently, it crucial a larger scale studies more focused comparisons, take into account differences patients’ response criteria additional confounding variables (age, BMI, previous IVF outcomes etc.), order reach definite conclusions.

参考文章(41)
Owen K. Davis, IVF Stimulation: Protocols for Poor Responders Methods in Molecular Biology. ,vol. 1154, pp. 329- 341 ,(2014) , 10.1007/978-1-4939-0659-8_15
Qiaohong Lai, Jun-Fa Xu, Ping Yang, Guijing Zhu, Zhijun Zhang, Qilin Yu, Long He, Shu Zhang, Yufeng Li, Hanwang Zhang, Cong-Yi Wang, Lei Jin, Comparison of the GnRH agonist and antagonist protocol on the same patients in assisted reproduction during controlled ovarian stimulation cycles. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology. ,vol. 6, pp. 1903- 1910 ,(2013)
Oehninger S, Poor responders in in vitro fertilization (IVF) therapy: the challenge continues. Facts, views & vision in obgyn. ,vol. 3, pp. 101- 108 ,(2011)
Mandy G. Katz-Jaffe, Alan O. Trounson, David S. Cram, Chromosome 21 mosaic human preimplantation embryos predominantly arise from diploid conceptions. Fertility and Sterility. ,vol. 84, pp. 634- 643 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.FERTNSTERT.2005.03.045
Mustafa Kara, Turgut Aydin, Turhan Aran, Nurettin Turktekin, Betul Ozdemir, Comparison of GnRH agonist and antagonist protocols in normoresponder patients who had IVF-ICSI Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. ,vol. 288, pp. 1413- 1416 ,(2013) , 10.1007/S00404-013-2903-Z
Laura Lawrence, Kelle Moley, Epigenetics and assisted reproductive technologies: human imprinting syndromes Seminars in Reproductive Medicine. ,vol. 26, pp. 143- 152 ,(2008) , 10.1055/S-2008-1042953
Stefania Malmusi, Antonio La Marca, Simone Giulini, Susanna Xella, Daniela Tagliasacchi, Tiziana Marsella, Annibale Volpe, Comparison of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and GnRH agonist flare-up regimen in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation Fertility and Sterility. ,vol. 84, pp. 402- 406 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.FERTNSTERT.2005.01.139
Saed M. Ziadeh, Muhannad R. Zakaria, Adel Abu-Hieja, Pregnancy rates using CC/hMG or hMG alone. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. ,vol. 23, pp. 97- 101 ,(1997) , 10.1111/J.1447-0756.1997.TB00813.X
CA Hodges, A Ilagan, D Jennings, R Keri, J Nilson, PA Hunt, Experimental evidence that changes in oocyte growth influence meiotic chromosome segregation Human Reproduction. ,vol. 17, pp. 1171- 1180 ,(2002) , 10.1093/HUMREP/17.5.1171