Gene patenting and licensing: the role of academic researchers and advocacy groups.

作者: David H Ledbetter

DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0B013E3181729DAB

关键词:

摘要: The subject of human gene patenting has received a great deal media attention, and many individuals professional societies (including the American College Medical Genetics) have voiced strong opinions against genes. A particular concern medical genetics community is impact on accessibility to high-quality genetic testing. There been significantly less attention public discussion licensing practices (e.g., exclusive versus nonexclusive) their role in promoting or limiting access Current US government policy strongly encourages universities commercialize inventions funded by federal grants (Bayh-Dole Act, 1980). Best Practice models for technology recently developed National Institutes Health Association University Technology Managers, encourage nonexclusive strategies except cases where this model will not lead successful commercialization. In case testing, CF gene) significant advantages encouraging multiple laboratories make test readily available, improvement, creating cost-competition. Individual investigators involved discovery, patient advocacy groups collaborating with academic investigators, opportunity influence diagnostic testing institutions follow Managers rights patents.

参考文章(13)
Anne-Marie Mazza, Stephen A. Merrill, None, Reaping the Benefits of Genomic and Proteomic Research: Intellectual Property Rights, Innovation, and Public Health National Academies Press (US). ,(2006)
Ruthie E. Amir, Ignatia B. Van den Veyver, Mimi Wan, Charles Q. Tran, Uta Francke, Huda Y. Zoghbi, Rett syndrome is caused by mutations in X-linked MECP2, encoding methyl-CpG-binding protein 2. Nature Genetics. ,vol. 23, pp. 185- 188 ,(1999) , 10.1038/13810
Kyle Jensen, Fiona Murray, Intellectual Property Landscape of the Human Genome Science. ,vol. 310, pp. 239- 240 ,(2005) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.1120014
Roger D Klein, Gene patents and genetic testing in the United States. Nature Biotechnology. ,vol. 25, pp. 989- 990 ,(2007) , 10.1038/NBT0907-989
Birgit Verbeure, Gert Matthijs, Geertrui Van Overwalle, Analysing DNA patents in relation with diagnostic genetic testing European Journal of Human Genetics. ,vol. 14, pp. 26- 33 ,(2006) , 10.1038/SJ.EJHG.5201503
Michael M Hopkins, Surya Mahdi, Pari Patel, Sandy M Thomas, DNA patenting: the end of an era? Nature Biotechnology. ,vol. 25, pp. 185- 187 ,(2007) , 10.1038/NBT0207-185
Gevork N Mnatzakanian, Hannes Lohi, Iulia Munteanu, Simon E Alfred, Takahiro Yamada, Patrick JM MacLeod, Julie R Jones, Stephen W Scherer, N Carolyn Schanen, Michael J Friez, John B Vincent, Berge A Minassian, None, A previously unidentified MECP2 open reading frame defines a new protein isoform relevant to Rett syndrome. Nature Genetics. ,vol. 36, pp. 339- 341 ,(2004) , 10.1038/NG1327
Lori Pressman, Richard Burgess, Robert M Cook-Deegan, Stephen J McCormack, Io Nami-Wolk, Melissa Soucy, LeRoy Walters, The licensing of DNA patents by US academic institutions: an empirical survey. Nature Biotechnology. ,vol. 24, pp. 31- 39 ,(2006) , 10.1038/NBT0106-31
Gert Matthijs, The European opposition against the BRCA gene patents. Familial Cancer. ,vol. 5, pp. 95- 102 ,(2006) , 10.1007/S10689-005-2580-6
Timothy Caulfield, Tania Bubela, C J Murdoch, Myriad and the mass media: the covering of a gene patent controversy Genetics in Medicine. ,vol. 9, pp. 850- 855 ,(2007) , 10.1097/GIM.0B013E31815BF965