New evolutionary foundations: Theoretical requirements for a science of sustainability ☆

作者: Timothy M. Waring

DOI: 10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2008.10.017

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Ecological economics stands in theoretical and ethical opposition to many aspects of neoclassical economic theory. Despite their sound critiques that theory, ecological economists have not settled on an alternative theory human behavior. As a potential alternative, Norgaard’s socioecological coevolutionary framework remains underspecified terms variation, heredity, selection. I review concepts insights behavior from evolutionary biology social science order supply new tools for problems, help refine the framework. argue synthetic provides sufficient perspective, cultural is necessary prerequisite mature science, ecological, or otherwise. Finally, suggest some topics such might begin tackle.

参考文章(109)
Herman E. Daly, Joy A. Bartholomew, Robert Costanza, Goals, agenda, and policy recommendations for ecological economics ,(1991)
Peter J. Richerson, Robert Boyd, The evolution of subjective commitment to groups: A tribal instincts hypothesis. Russell Sage Foundation. ,(2001)
R. Costanza, Ecological Economics 1 Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences#R##N#Encyclopedia of Ecology. pp. 999- 1006 ,(2008) , 10.1016/B978-008045405-4.00619-4
Robert Brandon, None, The Levels of Selection PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. ,vol. 1982, pp. 315- 323 ,(1982) , 10.1086/PSAPROCBIENMEETP.1982.1.192676
James H. Fowler, Tim Johnson, Oleg Smirnov, Egalitarian motive and altruistic punishment Nature. ,vol. 433, ,(2005) , 10.1038/NATURE03256
Susan J. Blackmore, The Meme Machine ,(1999)