Student Nurses’ Experience of Learning with Human Patient Simulation

作者: Jay Kyle Ober

DOI: 10.13028/98B4-CW76

关键词:

摘要: STUDENT NURSES’ EXPERIENCE OF LEARNING WITH HUMAN PATIENT SIMULATION APRIL 2009 JAY KYLE OBER, A.S.N, SPRINGFIELD TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE B.S., UNIVERSITY MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST M.S., BALL STATE MUNCIE, INDIANA Ph.D., WORCESTER Directed by: Professor Elaine Parker Human patient simulation (HPS) has been used for over 40 years in medical education. A human simulator is a life-like, anatomically correct, computer driven mannequin with physiologic responses that mimic real patients. Since the introduction of computerized HPS 2000, its use by and nursing students grown exponentially. Approximately 500 schools are using simulators Researchers have suggested can assist reducing gaps between theory practice improving critical thinking, decision making outcomes. An increase recognition errors dictated need to improve education allowing clinicians learn an environment permits do not put patients danger. However, there dearth research on benefits, advantages disadvantages as well learning experiences who their Therefore, purpose this qualitative study was describe analyze experience baccalaureate during Focus group interviews were recorded transcribed content analysis NVIVO, software program. The results categorized into four major themes: Structure, Environment, Instructor Learning. findings revealed felt structure optimize opportunities. Students wanted be properly oriented sessions, they lack realism did negatively affect learning. knowledgeable competent instructors had good interpersonal communication interaction skills. Last, expressed benefits from acting both nurse observer HPS. opportunity make mistakes without harming different types nurse-to-nurse reports viewed positive. further about student perceptions could provide valuable information educators policymakers implementation

参考文章(62)
Eileen Clark, Terence V McCann, Researching students: an ethical dilemma. Nurse Researcher. ,vol. 12, pp. 42- 51 ,(2005) , 10.7748/NR2005.01.12.3.42.C5947
Eduardo Salas, Katherine A. Wilson, C. Shawn Burke, Heather A. Priest, Using Simulation-Based Training to Improve Patient Safety: What Does It Take? The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. ,vol. 31, pp. 363- 371 ,(2005) , 10.1016/S1553-7250(05)31049-X
Edward W. Maibach, Richard A. Schieber, Mark F. B. Carroll, Self-efficacy in pediatric resuscitation: implications for education and performance. Pediatrics. ,vol. 97, pp. 94- 99 ,(1996)
M. Ronen, M. Eliahu, Simulation : a bridge between theory and reality : The case of electric circuits Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. ,vol. 16, pp. 14- 26 ,(2001) , 10.1046/J.1365-2729.2000.00112.X
Lesley Wilkes, Barbara Beale, Role conflict: appropriateness of a nurse researcher's actions in the clinical field. Nurse Researcher. ,vol. 12, pp. 57- 70 ,(2005) , 10.7748/NR2005.04.12.4.57.C5959
Diane B. Wayne, John Butter, Viva J. Siddall, Monica J. Fudala, Lee A. Linquist, Joe Feinglass, Leonard D. Wade, William C. McGaghie, Simulation-based training of internal medicine residents in advanced cardiac life support protocols: A randomized trial Teaching and Learning in Medicine. ,vol. 17, pp. 202- 208 ,(2005) , 10.1207/S15328015TLM1703_3
James A. Gordon, William M. Wilkerson, David Williamson Shaffer, Elizabeth G. Armstrong, "Practicing" medicine without risk: students' and educators' responses to high-fidelity patient simulation. Academic Medicine. ,vol. 76, pp. 469- 472 ,(2001) , 10.1097/00001888-200105000-00019
Michael A. DeVita, John Schaefer, John Lutz, Thomas Dongilli, Henry Wang, Improving medical crisis team performance Critical Care Medicine. ,vol. 32, ,(2004) , 10.1097/01.CCM.0000110872.86812.1C
John P Bentley, Paul G Thacker, The influence of risk and monetary payment on the research participation decision making process Journal of Medical Ethics. ,vol. 30, pp. 293- 298 ,(2004) , 10.1136/JME.2002.001594