Magnification chromoendoscopy for the diagnosis of gastric intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia.

作者: Mário Dinis-Ribeiro , Altamiro da Costa-Pereira , Carlos Lopes , Lúcio Lara-Santos , Mateus Guilherme

DOI: 10.1067/MGE.2003.145

关键词:

摘要: Background: The aim of this study was to define the reproducibility and accuracy magnification chromoendoscopy for diagnosis lesions associated with gastric cancer (intestinal metaplasia dysplasia). Methods: A total 136 patients previously diagnosed 5 gastrectomy specimens were studied. Endoscopic examination performed a endoscope after methylene blue (1%) spraying. According differences in color mucosal pattern, groups subgroups endoscopic images defined, biopsies taken (n=462). Five endoscopists asked classify individually 2 per subgroup on separate occasions. Results: Three defined: nonmetaplastic, nondysplastic mucosa (I); metaplastic (II); dysplastic (III). Ten defined according pit pattern: round small (IA), tubular (IB), coarse (IC), course pits straight (ID); irregular marks (IIA), (IIB), villi (IIC), (IID); loss clear depression (IIIA) or slight elevation (IIIB). kappa statistic intraobserver agreement classification 0.86; interobserver agreement, it 0.74. For into subgroups, values ranged from 0.48 0.78. 85% areas classified endoscopically as Group I (n=146), no gastritis described at histologic examination; 83% those II (n=198), intestinal found. Subgroups IIA IIB more often complete (62%), IIC IID incomplete (67%); III (n=118), dysplasia histopathologically 33%. dysplasia, specificity 81% (95% CI [77%, 85%]) negative predictive value 99% [99%, 100%]). Conclusions: Gastric patterns seem reproducible valid cancer. This procedure may improve follow-up individuals high-risk cancer, least exclusion severe lesions.

参考文章(45)
Herschel A. Carpenter, Nicholas J. Talley, Gastroscopy is incomplete without biopsy: Clinical relevance of distinguishing gastropathy from gastritis Gastroenterology. ,vol. 108, pp. 917- 924 ,(1995) , 10.1016/0016-5085(95)90468-9
RJ Schlemper, RH Riddell, Y e al Kato, F Borchard, HS Cooper, SM Dawsey, MF Dixon, CM Fenoglio-Preiser, JF Fléjou, K Geboes, T Hattori, T Hirota, M Itabashi, M Iwafuchi, A Iwashita, YI Kim, T Kirchner, M Klimpfinger, M Koike, GY Lauwers, KJ Lewin, G Oberhuber, F Offner, AB Price, CA Rubio, M Shimizu, T Shimoda, P Sipponen, E Solcia, M Stolte, H Watanabe, H Yamabe, The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia Gut. ,vol. 47, pp. 251- 255 ,(2000) , 10.1136/GUT.47.2.251
F Carneiro, J C Machado, L David, C Reis, A M M F Nogueira, M Sobrinho-Simões, Current thoughts on the histopathogenesis of gastric cancer. European Journal of Cancer Prevention. ,vol. 10, pp. 101- 102 ,(2001) , 10.1097/00008469-200102000-00013
Leonard Atkins, Edward B. Benedict, Correlation of gross gastroscopic findings with gastroscopic biopsy in gastritis. The New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 254, pp. 641- 644 ,(1956) , 10.1056/NEJM195604052541403
C De Gaetani, C Di Gregorio, R Fante, P Morandi, Gastric dysplasia. A follow-up study. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. ,vol. 88, pp. 1714- 1719 ,(1993)
T. Sauerbruch, M.A. Schreiber, P. Schüssler, W. Permanetter, Endoscopy in the diagnosis of gastritis. Diagnostic value of endoscopic criteria in relation to histological diagnosis. Endoscopy. ,vol. 16, pp. 101- 104 ,(1984) , 10.1055/S-2007-1018546
K Heinkel, Correlation of gastroscopy, gastric photography and biopsy in diagnosis. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. ,vol. 16, pp. 81- 85 ,(1969)
Meshkinpour H, Arguello Jf, DeMicco Mp, Orlando Ra, Significance of endoscopically visible blood vessels as an index of atrophic gastritis. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. ,vol. 71, pp. 376- 379 ,(1979)
Maratka Z, Endoscopic diagnosis of gastritis. Pros and cons. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. ,vol. 20, pp. 92- 93 ,(1995)