The Proximate Causes of Extinction

作者: D. Simberloff

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-70831-2_14

关键词:

摘要: The vast majority of contemporary extinctions can be viewed as anthropogenous in the sense that human activity greatly reduced population sizes and extinction would not likely have occurred now without activity. However, one still wish to know why small populations, even when protected from further interference, appear unusually prone extinction. Empirical data on last gasp such declining species are almost nonexistent but there is evidence four forces conspire put populations at increased risk: demographic stochasticity, genetic deterioration, social dysfunction, extrinsic forces. There presently no models accurately apportion threat among these available guidelines for indicating which especially risk very imprecise.

参考文章(40)
Daniel Simberloff, COMMUNITY EFFECTS OF INTRODUCED SPECIES Biotic Crises in Ecological and Evolutionary Time. pp. 53- 81 ,(1981) , 10.1016/B978-0-12-519640-6.50010-7
P.W. Sykes, Decline and disappearance of the dusky seaside sparrow from Merritt Island, Florida American Birds. ,vol. 34, pp. 728- 737 ,(1980)
Arthur Cleveland Bent, Life histories of North American gallinaceous birds Dover Publications. ,(1963)
Matthew H. Nitecki, Biotic crises in ecological and evolutionary time Academic Press. ,(1981)
Philip W. Hedrick, Genetics of populations ,(1983)
Steven M. Stanley, Macroevolution, pattern and process ,(1979)
Joseph Wood Krutch, H. J. Coolidge, Noel Simon, Peter Scott, James Fisher, Jack Vincent, Wildlife in Danger ,(1969)
Michael E. Soulé, Bruce A. Wilcox, Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary-Ecological Perspective ,(1980)
Robert H. MacArthur, Edward Osborne Wilson, The Theory of Island Biogeography ,(1967)