Vertebrates respond differently to human disturbance: implications for the use of a focal species approach

作者: Gentile Francesco Ficetola , Roberto Sacchi , Stefano Scali , Augusto Gentilli , Fiorenza De Bernardi

DOI: 10.1016/J.ACTAO.2006.10.001

关键词:

摘要: Focal species are surrogates assuming that all under consideration respond similarly to the threatening processes. Focusing management only on a small number of would improve conditions for other species. However, across-taxa congruency response processes, and subsequent efficiency focal as surrogates, has seldom been tested. In this study, we evaluated effects recreational disturbance wood structure communities terrestrial vertebrates in patches large urban park. We measured two recreation: direct (people presence) litter (effect trampling). used multiple techniques assess distribution mammals, birds, reptiles amphibians 44 patches. Disturbance maturity influenced some richness reptiles; however, pattern was not consistent across within classes or among classes. The performance multi umbrella poor. Our results suggest specific differences same source can be strong; these hinder usefulness tool.

参考文章(50)
Peter B. Landres, David N. Cole, Indirect effects of recreation on wildlife In: Knight, Richard L.; Gutzwiller , Kevin J ., eds. Wildlife and recreationists: coexistence through management and research. Washington, D.C.: Island Press: Chapter 11, 183-202. ,(1995)
Iñaki Rodríguez-Prieto, Esteban Fernández-Juricic, Effects of direct human disturbance on the endemic Iberian frog Rana iberica at individual and population levels Biological Conservation. ,vol. 123, pp. 1- 9 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2004.10.003
Robert J. Lambeck, Focal Species: A Multi-Species Umbrella for Nature Conservation Conservation Biology. ,vol. 11, pp. 849- 856 ,(1997) , 10.1046/J.1523-1739.1997.96319.X
J. H. Lawton, D. E. Bignell, B. Bolton, G. F. Bloemers, P. Eggleton, P. M. Hammond, M. Hodda, R. D. Holt, T. B. Larsen, N. A. Mawdsley, N. E. Stork, D. S. Srivastava, A. D. Watt, Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forest Nature. ,vol. 391, pp. 72- 76 ,(1998) , 10.1038/34166
Leanna D. Warman, David M. Forsyth, A. R. E. Sinclair, Kathryn Freemark, Harold D. Moore, Thomas W. Barrett, R. L. Pressey, Denis White, Species distributions, surrogacy, and important conservation regions in Canada Ecology Letters. ,vol. 7, pp. 374- 379 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.1461-0248.2004.00590.X
Mary Rose C. Posa, Navjot S. Sodhi, Effects of anthropogenic land use on forest birds and butterflies in Subic Bay, Philippines Biological Conservation. ,vol. 129, pp. 256- 270 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2005.10.041
Gentile Francesco Ficetola, Fiorenza De Bernardi, Amphibians in a human-dominated landscape: the community structure is related to habitat features and isolation Biological Conservation. ,vol. 119, pp. 219- 230 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2003.11.004
Mathieu Denoël, G. Francesco Ficetola, LANDSCAPE‐LEVEL THRESHOLDS AND NEWT CONSERVATION Ecological Applications. ,vol. 17, pp. 302- 309 ,(2007) , 10.1890/1051-0761(2007)017[0302:LTANC]2.0.CO;2
Joern Fischer, David B. Lindenmayer, Simon Barry, Emily Flowers, Lizard distribution patterns in the Tumut fragmentation “Natural Experiment” in south-eastern Australia Biological Conservation. ,vol. 123, pp. 301- 315 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2004.11.018
D.B. Lindenmayer, J. Fischer, Sound science or social hook—a response to Brooker’s application of the focal species approach Landscape and Urban Planning. ,vol. 62, pp. 149- 158 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00147-0