Approaches to Studying Policy Representation

作者: David E. Broockman

DOI: 10.1111/LSQ.12110

关键词:

摘要: Some studies of policy representation test hypotheses about the relationship between citizens' views and elites' positions on multiple issues by proceeding one issue at a time. Others summarize preferences with “ideology scores” these. I show that approach is flawed. It misinterprets ideology scores as summaries preferences, but these actually measure ideological consistency across areas: how often ideal policies are liberal or conservative. Examples attending to this distinction overturns conventional wisdom: legislators appear similarly moderate citizens, not more extreme; however, politically engaged citizens especially moderate.

参考文章(93)
Arthur Lupia, Gary W. Cox, Ken A. Shepsle, John Aldrich, James E. Alt, Majority Cycling and Agenda Manipulation: Richard McKelvey's Contributions and Legacy Positive Change in Political Science: The Legacy of Richard McKelvey's Most Influential Writings. ,(2007)
Philip E. Converse, The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics Psychology Press. pp. 181- 199 ,(2004) , 10.4324/9780203505984-10
James A. Stimson, Christopher Ellis, Ideology in America ,(2012)
Beth L. Leech, Frank R. Baumgartner, David C. Kimball, Jeffrey M. Berry, Marie Hojnacki, Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why ,(2009)
Thad Kousser, Justin Phillips, Boris Shor, Reform and Representation: A New Method Applied to Recent Electoral Changes Social Science Research Network. ,(2015) , 10.2139/SSRN.2260083
Michael B. Mackuen, James A. Stimson, Robert S. Erikson, The Macro Polity ,(2001)