Antibiotic sensitivity of bacteria associated with community-acquired urinary tract infection in Britain

作者: S. P. Barrett , M. A. Savage , M. P. Rebec , A. Guyot , N. Andrews

DOI: 10.1093/JAC/44.3.359

关键词:

摘要: Twelve laboratories in different parts of Britain each supplied approximately 80 consecutive urinary bacterial isolates from community patients. All strains were identified by a central laboratory, where sensitivity to variety orally administered antimicrobials was determined microtitre broth dilution. 65.1% Escherichia coil, 23.4% 'coliforms' other than E. 4.6% Proteus and Morganella spp., 1.8% Pseudomonas 2.4% enterococci, 0.7% group B streptococci, 1.5% coagulase-negative staphylococci 0.5% Staphylococcus aureus. Using previously published breakpoint values, 98.9% all found be sensitive norfloxacin ciprofloxacin, 95.7% co-amoxiclav, 86.8% nitrofurantoin, 77.4% cephalexin, 75.6% trimethoprim, 75.0% cephradine 51.7% amoxycillin. There some differences sensitivities between centres, particularly those the cephalosporins. standard breakpoints, submitting overestimate nitrofurantoin underestimate quinolones co-amoxiclav; there considerable overestimation

参考文章(11)
FERNANDO BAQUERO, From accuracy towards truth: the BSAC Working Party's guide to sensitivity testing. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. ,vol. 27, pp. 701- 702 ,(1991) , 10.1093/JAC/27.6.701
M. Hannan, M. Cormican, J. Flynn, A comparison of antimicrobial sensitivities of urinary pathogens for the years 1980 and 1990 Irish Journal of Medical Science. ,vol. 162, pp. 499- 501 ,(1993) , 10.1007/BF03022582
G. Ridgway, Multipoint Methods in the Clinical Laboratory Journal of Clinical Pathology. ,vol. 45, pp. 276- 276 ,(1992) , 10.1136/JCP.45.3.276-B
A. P. MacGowan, N. M. Brown, H. A. Holt, A. M. Lovering, S. Y. McCulloch, D. S. Reeves, An eight-year survey of the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of 85,971 bacteria isolated from patients in a district general hospital and the local community Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. ,vol. 31, pp. 543- 557 ,(1993) , 10.1093/JAC/31.4.543
T. M. MacDonald, D. Collins, M. M. McGilchrist, J. Stevens, A. D. McKendrick, D. G. McDevitt, P. G. Davey, The utilisation and economic evaluation of antibiotics prescribed in primary care Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. ,vol. 35, pp. 191- 204 ,(1995) , 10.1093/JAC/35.1.191
T. G. Winstanley, D. I. Limb, R. Eggington, F. Hancock, A 10 year survey of the antimicrobial susceptibility of urinary tract isolates in the UK: the Microbe Base project. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. ,vol. 40, pp. 591- 594 ,(1997) , 10.1093/JAC/40.4.591
Sven Ferry, Lars G. Burman, Stig E. Holm, Clinical and Bacteriological Effects of Therapy of Urinary Tract Infection in Primary Health Care: Relation to in vitro Sensitivity Testing Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases. ,vol. 20, pp. 535- 544 ,(1988) , 10.3109/00365548809032503
R. N. Gruneberg, Changes in urinary pathogens and their antibiotic sensitivities, 1971–1992 Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. ,vol. 33, pp. 1- 8 ,(1994) , 10.1093/JAC/33.SUPPL_A.1
J. M. Andrews, P. I. Phillips, M. A. King, R. C. Spencer, D. F. J. Brown, A. J. Bint, E. Bridson, E. M. Cooke, H. A. Holt, R. J. Williams, D. Greenwood, R. Wise, A GUIDE TO SENSITIVITY TESTING Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. ,vol. 27, pp. 1- 47 ,(1991)