作者: Tanya Heikkila , Andrea K. Gerlak
DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2018.1473244
关键词:
摘要: Learning among actors engaged in environmental governance can be a critical pathway toward institutional change. Learning, however, is often unintentional or idiosyncratic governance. This paper considers how the rules structuring an process enable constrain work of learning. We draw insights from theories learning and Institutional Analysis Development (IAD) framework's rule typology to identify particular types matter examine these help uncover lessons five empirical studies literature. conclude with discussion implications our analysis for devising intentionally foster