作者: Nancy Eisenberg
关键词:
摘要: Abstract Campbell and Christopher criticized the literature on moral development altruism for its reliance Kantian presuppositions suggested alternative ways to view morality. Although their arguments are convincing in regard importance of considering other conceptions morality, a number assertions work prosocial behavior less convincing. based some conclusions questionable definitions altruism, incorrect assumptions about others' beliefs, reference limited portion research behavior. These limitations Christopher's discussed. In addition, pertaining factors viewed by as neglected theory is briefly reviewed. It that have played only minor role development.