Identifying critical steps towards improved access to innovation in cancer care: a European CanCer Organisation position paper.

作者: Matti Aapro , Alain Astier , Riccardo Audisio , Ian Banks , Pierre Bedossa

DOI: 10.1016/J.EJCA.2017.04.014

关键词:

摘要: In recent decades cancer care has seen improvements in the speed and accuracy of diagnostic procedures; effectiveness surgery, radiation therapy medical treatments; power information technology; development multidisciplinary, specialist-led approaches to care. Such innovations are essential if we continue improving lives patients across Europe despite financial pressures on our healthcare systems. Investment innovation must be balanced with need ensure sustainability budgets, all health professionals have a responsibility help achieve this balance. It requires scrutiny way is delivered; ready discontinue practices or interventions that inefficient, prioritise may deliver best outcomes possible for within limits available resources. Decisions should take into account their long-term impact patient costs, not just immediate costs. Adopting culture multidisciplinary team approach, at centre an integral part team. whole-system whole-patient perspective guided by high-quality real-world data, including relevant actual costs care; accurately reflects any clinical practice. The European CanCer Organisation committed working its member societies, organisations community large find sustainable ways identify integrate most meaningful aspects

参考文章(47)
David E. Gerber, Targeted therapies: a new generation of cancer treatments. American Family Physician. ,vol. 77, pp. 311- 319 ,(2008)
T. Tot, G. Viale, E. Rutgers, E. Bergsten-Nordström, A. Costa, Optimal breast cancer pathology manifesto. European Journal of Cancer. ,vol. 51, pp. 2285- 2288 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.EJCA.2015.06.127
Sebastian Salas-Vega, Adria Haimann, Elias Mossialos, Big Data and Health Care: Challenges and Opportunities for Coordinated Policy Development in the EU Health Systems & Reform. ,vol. 1, pp. 285- 300 ,(2015) , 10.1080/23288604.2015.1091538
Gilles Vassal, Edel Fitzgerald, Martin Schrappe, Frédéric Arnold, Jerzy Kowalczyk, David Walker, Lars Hjorth, Riccardo Riccardi, Anita Kienesberger, Kathy‐Pritchard Jones, Maria Grazia Valsecchi, Dragana Janic, Henrik Hasle, Pamela Kearns, Giulia Petrarulo, Francesco Florindi, Samira Essiaf, Ruth Ladenstein, Challenges for children and adolescents with cancer in Europe: The SIOP-Europe agenda Pediatric Blood & Cancer. ,vol. 61, pp. 1551- 1557 ,(2014) , 10.1002/PBC.25044
McCulloch P, None, No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. The Lancet. ,vol. 374, pp. 1105- 1112 ,(2009) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61116-8
R. J. Heald, E. M. Husband, R. D. H. Ryall, The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery--the clue to pelvic recurrence? British Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 69, pp. 613- 616 ,(2005) , 10.1002/BJS.1800691019
NancyE Epstein, Multidisciplinary in-hospital teams improve patient outcomes: A review. Surgical Neurology International. ,vol. 5, pp. 295- ,(2014) , 10.4103/2152-7806.139612
Cynthia Owusu, Nathan A Berger, Comprehensive geriatric assessment in the older cancer patient: coming of age in clinical cancer care. Clinical practice (London, England). ,vol. 11, pp. 749- 762 ,(2014) , 10.2217/CPR.14.72
A El Turabi, G A Abel, M Roland, G Lyratzopoulos, Variation in reported experience of involvement in cancer treatment decision making: evidence from the National Cancer Patient Experience Survey British Journal of Cancer. ,vol. 109, pp. 780- 787 ,(2013) , 10.1038/BJC.2013.316