Prolonged infusion gemcitabine: a clinical phase I study at low- (300 mg/m2) and high-dose (875 mg/m2) levels

作者: Camillo F. Pollera , Anna Ceribelli , Marcello Crecco , Cristina Oliva

DOI: 10.1023/A:1005817024382

关键词:

摘要: Gemcitabine (GEM) is a novel nucleoside analogue with unique mechanism of action. Preliminary studies have shown mild, schedule-dependent toxic profile broad range MTDs and promising antitumor activity in various solid tumors. This phase I study describes the infusion length-effect relationships low(300 mg/m2) high-dose (875 GEM, administered on days 1, 8 15 at 4-week intervals step-wise escalation duration (> 33%) starting level 60 minutes. At least 3 patients entered each infusion-level step more cases were treated presence significant toxicity. Conservative criteria for toxicity employed, including treatment delay until recovery de-escalation subsequent course. Forty seven (29 low- 18 GEM levels) tumors, 9 (taken as reference) who had received same dose-levels over 30 min. study. All but (with pancreatic cancer) been previously chemotherapy all extensive visceral disease. A striking infusional-effect relationship was observed both dose levels. Four steps required to define maximum tolerated time (MTIT) 6 hours 300 mg/m2 leucopenia being dose-limiting. 875 mg/m2, although no limiting (in spite increased severity leucopenia), attempted following 1 hour infusion, due rate (58% 12 patients) requiring shorter infusions. Toxicity usually mild (no grade 4 event recorded) showing usual profile, there trend towards non-hematologic (i.e. LFT abnormalities) compared MTD defined using 30-min. schedule (1,370 mg/m2). Eight achieved PR: NSCLC, gastric 2 bladder cancer (1 3- 6-hour infusion) pancreatic, cervical another (all one 1-hour infusion). These data clearly suggest that an important independent factor influences clinical effects GEM. The present not only profiles MTITs selected demonstrated retained doses small when given prolonged infusion. Further should clarify underlying mechanism(s) responsible erratic dose-effect establish optimal dose-infusion

参考文章(12)
Hagop Kantarjian, Michael J. Keating, William Plunkett, James Abbruzzese, Peter Tarassoff, Ralf Grunewald, Pharmacologically directed design of the dose rate and schedule of 2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine (Gemcitabine) administration in leukemia. Cancer Research. ,vol. 50, pp. 6823- 6826 ,(1990)
J L Abbruzzese, R Grunewald, E A Weeks, D Gravel, T Adams, B Nowak, S Mineishi, P Tarassoff, W Satterlee, M N Raber, A phase I clinical, plasma, and cellular pharmacology study of gemcitabine. Journal of Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 9, pp. 491- 498 ,(1991) , 10.1200/JCO.1991.9.3.491
R Grunewald, H Kantarjian, M Du, K Faucher, P Tarassoff, W Plunkett, Gemcitabine in leukemia: a phase I clinical, plasma, and cellular pharmacology study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 10, pp. 406- 413 ,(1992) , 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.3.406
Elizabeth A. Poplin, Thomas Corbett, Lawrence Flaherty, Peter Tarasoff, Bruce G. Redman, Manuel Valdivieso, Laurence Baker, Difluorodeoxycytidine (dFdC)--gemcitabine: a phase I study. Investigational New Drugs. ,vol. 10, pp. 165- 170 ,(1992) , 10.1007/BF00877241
Veronique W.T.Ruiz Van Haperen, Gijsbert Veerman, Epie Boven, Paul Noordhuis, Jan B. Vermorken, Godefridus J. Peters, Schedule dependence of sensitivity to 2′,2′-difluorodeoxycytidine (gemcitabine) in relation to accumulation and retention of its triphosphate in solid tumour cell lines and solid tumours Biochemical Pharmacology. ,vol. 48, pp. 1327- 1339 ,(1994) , 10.1016/0006-2952(94)90554-1
H Anderson, N Thatcher, J Walling, H Hansen, A phase I study of a 24 hour infusion of gemcitabine in previously untreated patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. British Journal of Cancer. ,vol. 74, pp. 460- 462 ,(1996) , 10.1038/BJC.1996.382
Ralf Grunewald, James L. Abbruzzese, Peter Tarassoff, William Plunkett, Saturation of 2′, 2′-difluorodeoxycytidine 5′-triphosphate accumulation by mononuclear cells during a phase I trial of gemcitabine Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology. ,vol. 27, pp. 258- 262 ,(1991) , 10.1007/BF00685109
Birthe Lund, Paul E.G. Kristjansen, Heine H. Hansen, Clinical and preclinical activity of 2′,2′- difluorodeoxycytidine (gemcitabine) Cancer Treatment Reviews. ,vol. 19, pp. 45- 55 ,(1993) , 10.1016/0305-7372(93)90026-N
Gijsbert Veerman, V. W. T. Ruiz van Haperen, Jan B. Vermorken, Paul Noordhuis, Boudewijn J. M. Braakhuis, Herbert M. Pinedo, G. J. Peters, Antitumor activity of prolonged as compared with bolus administration of 2′,2′-difluorodeoxycytidine in vivo against murine colon tumors Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology. ,vol. 38, pp. 335- 342 ,(1996) , 10.1007/S002800050492
A. B. Miller, B. Hoogstraten, M. Staquet, A. Winkler, Reporting results of cancer treatment Cancer. ,vol. 47, pp. 207- 214 ,(1981) , 10.1002/1097-0142(19810101)47:1<207::AID-CNCR2820470134>3.0.CO;2-6