作者: Julia V Furtado , António C Moreira , Jorge Mota , None
DOI: 10.3390/BS11020021
关键词:
摘要: Gender affirmative action (AA) in management remains a controversial topic among scholars, practitioners, and employees. While some individuals may support the use of AA policies as means increasing representation women, others are not supportive at all, further understanding gender an unacceptable violation merit—even when targeted by it. With aim analyzing how scholars have approached subject, we systematically reviewed 76 published articles (SCOPUS database), covering extant literature on management. Findings indicate consensus regarding common antecedents attitudes towards with prior experiences diversity (DM) (as well general perceptions AA). Performance satisfaction appear predominant outcomes. In addition, while investigating differences AA, equal employment opportunity (EEO) (DM), mainly focused effectiveness inclusion minorities general. We conclude that despite marginal studies employees’ toward there is gap literature, particularly absence research bivalent position meritocracy (or merit violation) both antecedent outcome which deserves scrutiny.