Voting with their Mice: Personal Genome Testing and the “Participatory Turn” in Disease Research

作者: Barbara Prainsack,

DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2011.575032

关键词:

摘要: While the availability of genome tests on internet has given rise to heated debates about likely impact personal information test-takers, insurance, and healthcare systems, in this article I argue that a more tangible effect genomics is it started change how participation disease research conceived enacted. examine three models customers are encouraged engage in. conclude with an evaluation pitfalls benefits “crowdsourcing” genetic context genomics.

参考文章(52)
Gísli Pálsson, Anthropology and the New Genetics ,(2007)
Amy L. McGuire, Christina M. Diaz, Tao Wang, Susan G. Hilsenbeck, Social Networkers’ Attitudes Toward Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genome Testing American Journal of Bioethics. ,vol. 9, pp. 3- 10 ,(2009) , 10.1080/15265160902928209
L. Johnsson, M. G Hansson, S. Eriksson, G. Helgesson, Patients’ refusal to consent to storage and use of samples in Swedish biobanks: cross sectional study BMJ. ,vol. 337, pp. 224- 226 ,(2008) , 10.1136/BMJ.A345
Klaus Hoeyer, Bert-Ove Olofsson, Tom Mjörndal, Niels Lynöe, Informed consent and biobanks: a population-based study of attitudes towards tissue donation for genetic research: Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. ,vol. 32, pp. 224- 229 ,(2004) , 10.1080/14034940310019506
Heidi Ledford, Garage biotech: Life hackers Nature. ,vol. 467, pp. 650- 652 ,(2010) , 10.1038/467650A
Oksana A Makeeva, Valentina V Markova, Valery P Puzyrev, Public interest and expectations concerning commercial genotyping and genetic risk assessment Personalized Medicine. ,vol. 6, pp. 329- 341 ,(2009) , 10.2217/PME.09.14
David Gurwitz, Yael Bregman-Eschet, Personal genomics services: whose genomes? European Journal of Human Genetics. ,vol. 17, pp. 883- 889 ,(2009) , 10.1038/EJHG.2008.254