Knowledge, International Relations and the structure–agency debate: towards the concept of “epistemic selectivities”†

作者: Alice B.M. Vadrot

DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2016.1226787

关键词:

摘要: The aim of this article is to develop a framework within which the role and social construction knowledge in International Relations can be understood theoretically underpinned. In order do so, discusses post-structuralist neo-Gramscian answers structure–agency debate argues that remains rather implicit both understandings on how structure agency are mutually constituted. main argument only understood, if analysed terms dialectically constituted relationship between visible through processes whereby science expert referred as true policy relevant. On basis, develops concept “epistemic selectivities”, describes use underpin strategic action leads hegemonic patterns way (scientific) knowl...

参考文章(36)
Ruth Wodak, Norman Fairclough, Bob Jessop, The Knowledge-based Economy and Higher Education in Europe. Sense. ,(2008)
Timothy J. Sinclair, Robert W. Cox, Approaches to world order ,(1996)
Quintin Hoare, Geoffrey Nowell-Smith, Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci ,(2015)
Alice B.M. Vadrot, The epistemic and strategic dimension of the establishment of the IPBES: “epistemic selectivities” at work Innovation-the European Journal of Social Science Research. ,vol. 27, pp. 361- 378 ,(2014) , 10.1080/13511610.2014.962014
ROXANNE LYNN DOTY, Aporia:: A Critical Exploration of the Agent-Structure Problematique in International Relations Theory European Journal of International Relations. ,vol. 3, pp. 365- 392 ,(1997) , 10.1177/1354066197003003004