Participation in payments for ecosystem services programs in the Global South: A systematic review

作者: Kelly W. Jones , Kathryn Powlen , Ryan Roberts , Xoco Shinbrot

DOI: 10.1016/J.ECOSER.2020.101159

关键词:

摘要: Abstract This article presents a systematic review of the factors and motivations that explain participation in payments for ecosystem services (PES) programs Global South. PES are voluntary conservation incentive is determined by eligibility, willingness, ability to participate. Following PRISMA guidelines, we 78 studies summarize how willingness (financial non-financial motivations) (based on capital assets framework) participate measured direction influence these variables. An increasing number assess role both financial motivators participation. Financial motivators, including pro-social, pro-environmental, risk reduction, positively Most consider at least one asset determining programs. In general, participants have more than non-participants. Our findings suggest theory behind mechanisms work needs be updated account complex behavioral theories wider set motivations. Results from this can used inform design help shed light why achieve their environmental or socioeconomic objectives.

参考文章(83)
Cyrus Samii, Matthew Lisiecki, Parashar Kulkarni, Laura Paler, Larry Chavis, Birte Snilstveit, Martina Vojtkova, Emma Gallagher, Effects of Payment for Environmental Services (PES) on Deforestation and Poverty in Low and Middle Income Countries: A Systematic Review Campbell Systematic Reviews. ,vol. 10, pp. 1- 95 ,(2014) , 10.4073/CSR.2014.11
Xavier B. Lastra-Bravo, Carmen Hubbard, Guy Garrod, Alfredo Tolón-Becerra, What drives farmers’ participation in EU agri-environmental schemes?: Results from a qualitative meta-analysis Environmental Science & Policy. ,vol. 54, pp. 1- 9 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.ENVSCI.2015.06.002
Jennifer M. Alix-Garcia, Katharine R. E. Sims, Patricia Yañez-Pagans, Only One Tree from Each Seed? Environmental Effectiveness and Poverty Alleviation in Mexico's Payments for Ecosystem Services Program American Economic Journal: Economic Policy. ,vol. 7, pp. 1- 40 ,(2015) , 10.1257/POL.20130139
Adam P. Hejnowicz, David G. Raffaelli, Murray A. Rudd, Piran C.L. White, Evaluating the outcomes of payments for ecosystem services programmes using a capital asset framework Ecosystem services. ,vol. 9, pp. 83- 97 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.ECOSER.2014.05.001
Matheus A. Zanella, Christian Schleyer, Stijn Speelman, Why do farmers join Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) schemes? An Assessment of PES water scheme participation in Brazil Ecological Economics. ,vol. 105, pp. 166- 176 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2014.06.004
Bunafsha Mislimshoeva, Cyrus Samimi, Joachim-F. Kirchhoff, Thomas Koellner, Analysis of costs and people's willingness to enroll in forest rehabilitation in Gorno Badakhshan, Tajikistan Forest Policy and Economics. ,vol. 37, pp. 75- 83 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.FORPOL.2012.12.001
Free de Koning, Marcela Aguiñaga, Manuel Bravo, Marco Chiu, Max Lascano, Tannya Lozada, Luis Suarez, Bridging the gap between forest conservation and poverty alleviation: the Ecuadorian Socio Bosque program Environmental Science & Policy. ,vol. 14, pp. 531- 542 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.ENVSCI.2011.04.007
Vijay Kolinjivadi, Angela Grant, Jan Adamowski, Nicolás Kosoy, Juggling multiple dimensions in a complex socio-ecosystem: The issue of targeting in payments for ecosystem services Geoforum. ,vol. 58, pp. 1- 13 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.GEOFORUM.2014.10.004
A. Franco, N. Malhotra, G. Simonovits, Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer Science. ,vol. 345, pp. 1502- 1505 ,(2014) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.1255484
Rodrigo A Arriagada, Erin O Sills, Subhrendu K Pattanayak, Paul J Ferraro, None, Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods to Evaluate Participation in Costa Rica's Program of Payments for Environmental Services Journal of Sustainable Forestry. ,vol. 28, pp. 343- 367 ,(2009) , 10.1080/10549810802701192