A Commentary on: “Preserving cortico-striatal function: Deep Brain Stimulation in Huntington's disease”

作者: Christopher M. Tolleson

DOI: 10.3389/FNSYS.2015.00057

关键词:

摘要: I read Nagel et al. with interest (Nagel al., 2015). In theory, the potential to modify cognitive function in Huntington's disease (HD) electrical stimulation or specifically Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is exciting. HD a devastating and terminal need of better treatments, both symptomatic neuroprotective. Cognitive dysfunction itself becoming more recognized as severely disabling aspect well (Paulsen Long, 2014). outline an intriguing argument for pursuing globus pallidus externa DBS target improvement while also acknowledging that current evidence based on small number animal models very limited human (n = 2) experience. In actuality, practical nature pursing treatment cognition complicated. The ethics new indications hotly debated topic (Unterrainer Oduncu, We still do not yet fully understand mechanism treating disorders where its efficacy established. Trialing it other neurologic conditions without sound rational can be unnecessarily dangerous best those we are trying treat. While was relatively free complications trials chorea, benign procedure. It brain surgery known irreversible surgical including infection, stroke, intracranial bleeding even death (Bronstein 2011). Some authors cite complication rates Parkinson's high 10% hemorrhage, 2% 15% infection up 4.5% Hardware requiring repeat occur. Finally, behavior have been negatively impacted after surgery, albeit often cited subthalamic disease. Still, there accounts decline mania pallidal (Miyawaki 2000; Rothlind Considering these neuropsychiatric complications, would proceed cautiously given incidence pre-existing increased risk suicide. Lastly, caution against making any statements alluding slowing progression neuroprotection data, especially perspective future participants trials. This too premature. indeed desperate population ability identify subjects early prodromal stage increases inappropriate improper recruitment Any research using this needs done slowly highest ethical standards rigorous consenting protocols. Personally, commonly recommend my patients currently approved participate volume surgeries, am holding out hope medicinal, neuroprotective therapy reversible adverse effects carry surgery.

参考文章(6)
Sean J. Nagel, Andre G. Machado, John T. Gale, Darlene A. Lobel, Mayur Pandya, Preserving cortico-striatal function: deep brain stimulation in Huntington’s disease Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. ,vol. 9, pp. 32- 32 ,(2015) , 10.3389/FNSYS.2015.00032
Marcus Unterrainer, Fuat S. Oduncu, The ethics of deep brain stimulation (DBS). Medicine Health Care and Philosophy. ,vol. 18, pp. 475- 485 ,(2015) , 10.1007/S11019-015-9622-0
Alim Louis Benabid, Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. ,vol. 13, pp. 696- 706 ,(2003) , 10.1016/J.CONB.2003.11.001
Edison Miyawaki, Joel S. Perlmutter, Alexander I. Tröster, Tom O. Videen, William C. Koller, The Behavioral Complications of Pallidal Stimulation: A Case Report Brain and Cognition. ,vol. 42, pp. 417- 434 ,(2000) , 10.1006/BRCG.1999.1113
Johannes C Rothlind, Michele K York, Kim Carlson, Ping Luo, William J Marks, Frances M Weaver, Matthew Stern, Kenneth Follett, Domenic Reda, None, Neuropsychological changes following deep brain stimulation surgery for Parkinson's disease: comparisons of treatment at pallidal and subthalamic targets versus best medical therapy Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. ,vol. 86, pp. 622- 629 ,(2015) , 10.1136/JNNP-2014-308119
Jane S. Paulsen, Jeffrey D. Long, Onset of Huntington's disease: Can it be purely cognitive? Movement Disorders. ,vol. 29, pp. 1342- 1350 ,(2014) , 10.1002/MDS.25997