The Relationship among Correct and Error Oral Reading Rates and Comprehension

作者: Michael Roberts , Deborah Deutsch Smith

DOI: 10.2307/1510426

关键词:

摘要: Eight learning disabled boys participated in the study. All were seriously deficient in both their oral reading and comprehension performances. Through a series of multiple baseline and crossover designs, the relationships among enhanced correct reading rates and comprehension, decreased error reading rates and comprehension, and increased comprehension and oral reading were studied. Each time an intervention was scheduled, the desired changes were noted for the targeted variable. Improvement, however, in either correct rate or error rate scores produced only mild increases in comprehension. Interestingly, when comprehension was targeted, correct and error rate scores also were at desirable levels.

参考文章(6)
Carolyn Whitlock, Don Bushell, Some effects of “back-up” reinforcers on reading behavior ☆ ☆☆ Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. ,vol. 5, pp. 50- 57 ,(1967) , 10.1016/0022-0965(67)90076-8
Joseph R. Jenkins, Armanda Barksdale, LeRoy Clinton, Improving Reading Comprehension and Oral Reading: Generalization Across Behaviors, Settings, and Time Journal of Learning Disabilities. ,vol. 11, pp. 607- 617 ,(1978) , 10.1177/002221947801101002
Thomas C. Lovitt, Cheryl L. Hansen, The Use of Contingent Skipping and Drilling to Improve Oral Reading and Comprehension Journal of Learning Disabilities. ,vol. 9, pp. 481- 487 ,(1976) , 10.1177/002221947600900802
Dennis R. Knapczyk, Gary Livingston, Self-recording and student teacher supervision: variables within a token economy structure. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. ,vol. 6, pp. 481- 486 ,(1973) , 10.1901/JABA.1973.6-481
Benjamin B Lahey, Michael P McNees, Cathy C Brown, None, Modification of deficits in reading for comprehension. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. ,vol. 6, pp. 475- 480 ,(1973) , 10.1901/JABA.1973.6-475
Thomas C. Lovitt, Cheryl L. Hansen, Round One — Placing the Child in the Right Reader Journal of Learning Disabilities. ,vol. 9, pp. 18- 24 ,(1976) , 10.1177/002221947600900603