The impact of the VF-14 index, a perceived visual function measure, in the routine management of cataract patients.

作者: J. M. Valderas , M. Rue , G. Guyatt , J. Alonso

DOI: 10.1007/S11136-005-1745-Y

关键词:

摘要: Background: Evidence about the impact of routine feedback patient-reported outcomes is contradictory, and there limited information regarding its use in management cataract patients. Methods: The VF-14 Index was used to assess visual function 833 consecutive patients, attending 19 ophthalmologists from public private hospitals primary care practices Spain, 1999–2000. In this before/after trial, intervention included (1) an educational session, (2) provision scores all subsequent patients ophthalmologist. Mixed effects linear logistic models were constructed effect on process (correlation between patients’ physicians’ assessments function, appropriateness surgery recommendation) outcome (satisfaction). Results: adjusted regression coefficient for score significantly increased after as a predictor ophthalmologist’s assessment (β coefficient: control 0.10 vs. 0.35, p < 0.05). did not increase probability appropriate medical decision (OR=0.90; 95% CI: 0.42; 2,69) it change patient satisfaction with care. Conclusions: Routine education patient’s increases agreement functional capacity. lack beneficial or suggests need more intense practice.

参考文章(29)
Donald Thomas Campbell, Thomas D. Cook, Quasi-Experimentation: Design & Analysis Issues for Field Settings ,(1979)
John L. Eltinge, William M. Sribney, Estimates of linear combinations and hypothesis tests for survey data Stata Technical Bulletin. ,vol. 6, ,(1997)
Michael J. Campbell, T. D. V. Swinscow, Statistics at Square One ,(1976)
Jordi Alonso, Mireia Espallargues, Tavs F. Andersen, Sandra D. Cassard, Elaine Dunn, Peter Bernth-Petersen, Jens C. Norregaard, Charlyn Black, Earl P. Steinberg, Gerard F. Anderson, International Applicability of the VF-14: An Index of Visual Function in Patients with Cataracts Ophthalmology. ,vol. 104, pp. 799- 807 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0161-6420(97)30230-9
A D Oxman, R B Haynes, M A Thomson, D A Davis, No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice Canadian Medical Association Journal. ,vol. 153, pp. 1423- 1431 ,(1995)
Alfonso Casado, Luis Prieto, Rosa Lamarca, La evaluación de la fiabilidad en las observaciones clínicas: el coeficiente de correlación intraclase Medicina Clinica. ,vol. 110, pp. 142- 145 ,(1998)
L. L. Kupper, K. E. Muller, D. G. Kleinbaum, Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods ,(1978)
Suriya Foran, Causes of Incident Visual Impairment Archives of Ophthalmology. ,vol. 120, pp. 613- 619 ,(2002) , 10.1001/ARCHOPHT.120.5.613
J.M. Valderas, J. Alonso, L. Prieto, M. Espallargues, X. Castells, Content-based interpretation aids for health-related quality of life measures in clinical practice. An example for the visual function index (VF-14) Quality of Life Research. ,vol. 13, pp. 35- 44 ,(2004) , 10.1023/B:QURE.0000015298.09085.B0