Commuting in multi-nodal urban systems: an empirical comparison of three alternative models.
作者： L. van der, J., R. Laan Vogelsang Schalke
关键词:
摘要: This paper analyses whether the basic monocentric model of urban structure and commuting explains actual in Europe i.e. The Netherlands. As USA much wasteful is established. has a low degree explanatory power. In order to get more line with elaborates two alternatives model. Besides deconcentrated cross-traffic developed. Particularly latter quite successful explaining commuting. pleads for endogenising employment stresses heterogeneity labour demand supply. (EXCERPT)
sci-hub.se 参考文章(31)
The Randstad : a research and policy laboratory Kluwer Academic Publishers. ,(1992) , 10.1007/978-94-017-3448-6
Katherine Duffy, Mike Campbell, Local labour markets : problems and policies Longman. ,(1992)
Lawrence Thurston, Anthony M.J. Yezer, Causality in the Suburbanization of Population and Employment Journal of Urban Economics. ,vol. 35, pp. 105- 118 ,(1994) , 10.1006/JUEC.1994.1006
Paul Waddell, Exogenous Workplace Choice in Residential Location Models: Is the Assumption Valid? Geographical Analysis. ,vol. 25, pp. 65- 82 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1538-4632.1993.TB00280.X
Michelle J. White, Urban Commuting Journeys Are Not "Wasteful" Journal of Political Economy. ,vol. 96, pp. 1097- 1110 ,(1988) , 10.1086/261579
Marlon G. Boarnet, The Monocentric Model and Employment Location Journal of Urban Economics. ,vol. 36, pp. 79- 97 ,(1994) , 10.1006/JUEC.1994.1027
William A. V. Clark, Marianne Kuijpers-Linde, Commuting in Restructuring Urban Regions Urban Studies. ,vol. 31, pp. 465- 483 ,(1994) , 10.1080/00420989420080431
Edwin S. Mills, The measurement and determinants of suburbanization Journal of Urban Economics. ,vol. 32, pp. 377- 387 ,(1992) , 10.1016/0094-1190(92)90025-G
M.W Smart, Labour market areas: Uses and definition Progress in Planning. ,vol. 2, pp. 239- 353 ,(1974) , 10.1016/0305-9006(74)90008-7
John Yinger, City and suburb: Urban models with more than one employment center Journal of Urban Economics. ,vol. 31, pp. 181- 205 ,(1992) , 10.1016/0094-1190(92)90052-M