Neither Modernist Nor Postmodernist — A Third Way

作者: Mara Beller

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-08129-7_13

关键词:

摘要: In this paper I undertake an analysis of the heritage Kuhn and Feyerabend as compared with main tenets logical positivism, identify components positivism that directly lead to relativism. argue notion consensus creates major problems in historiography philosophy science, preventing a description scientific change. further concept creative disagreement should be introduced into studies science not only historical actuality, but also basic epistemological methodological presupposition. trace grip social Durkheim’s heritage, focusing on representatives Strong Program sociology science. Thomas inherited same Durkheimian view society through Ludwik Fleck Finally, briefly outline dialogical alternative current historiography—an which plays fundamental role.

参考文章(37)
Henk w. de Regt, Quantum dialogue : the making of a revolution Erkenntnis. ,vol. 56, pp. 247- 252 ,(2002) , 10.1023/A:1015612805156
Mara Beller, Arthur Fine, Bohr’s Response to EPR Springer Netherlands. pp. 1- 31 ,(1994) , 10.1007/978-94-015-8106-6_1
Thomas S. Kuhn, The Road since Structure ,(2000)
Marcello Pera, William R. Shea, Persuading science : the art of scientific rhetoric Science History Publications, USA. ,(1991)
Althea Beery, Helen Crossen, Arthur I. Gates, here and everywhere Macmillan. ,(1951)
Michael Friedman, Reconsidering Logical Positivism ,(1999)
THOMAS KUHN, What Are Scientific Revolutions? Philosophy, Science, and History. pp. 71- 88 ,(2014) , 10.4324/9780203802458-6
Paul R. Gross, Martin W. Lewis, Norman Levitt, The flight from science and reason Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. ,(1996)