Using real options for urban infrastructure adaptation under climate change

作者: Kyeongseok Kim , Sooji Ha , Hyoungkwan Kim

DOI: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.12.152

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Climate uncertainties pose a problem for decision makers as they cannot choose and implement an effective adaptation strategy in infrastructure. An can be derived only when the potential damage induced by climate change is well understood. This study proposed decision-making model to evaluate economic feasibility of projects urban area. The scenarios technical factors were used calculate volatility that reflects reduction relies on type real options, called “chooser option”, consider managerial flexibility long-term management estimate value investment with reasonable accuracy based representative concentration pathway (RCP) scenarios. A case involving disaster prevention facility Seoul, Korea was conducted demonstrate model’s applicability. expected provide guidance development strategies

参考文章(28)
Jim W. Hall, Sally Brown, Robert J. Nicholls, Nick F. Pidgeon, Robert T. Watson, Commentary: Proportionate adaptation Nature Climate Change. ,(2012) , 10.1038/NCLIMATE1749
Prasad Kodukula, Chandra Papudesu, Project Valuation Using Real Options: A Practitioner's Guide ,(2006)
Sangseom Jeong, Yongmin Kim, Joon Kyu Lee, Junghwan Kim, The 27 July 2011 debris flows at Umyeonsan, Seoul, Korea Landslides. ,vol. 12, pp. 799- 813 ,(2015) , 10.1007/S10346-015-0595-0
Michelle Woodward, Zoran Kapelan, Ben Gouldby, Adaptive Flood Risk Management Under Climate Change Uncertainty Using Real Options and Optimization Risk Analysis. ,vol. 34, pp. 75- 92 ,(2014) , 10.1111/RISA.12088
Kes McCormick, Stefan Anderberg, Lars Coenen, Lena Neij, Advancing Sustainable Urban Transformation Journal of Cleaner Production. ,vol. 50, pp. 1- 11 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2013.01.003
Vladimir Antikarov, Thomas E. Copeland, Real Options: A Practitioner's Guide ,(2001)