Explanatory Abstraction and the Goldilocks Problem: Interventionism Gets Things Just Right

作者: Thomas Blanchard

DOI: 10.1093/BJPS/AXY030

关键词:

摘要: AbstractTheories of explanation need to account for a puzzling feature our explanatory practices: the fact that we prefer explanations are relatively abstract but only moderately so. Contra...

参考文章(19)
Christopher Hitchcock, The Intransitivity of Causation Revealed in Equations and Graphs The Journal of Philosophy. ,vol. 98, pp. 273- 299 ,(2001) , 10.2307/2678432
BRIAN WEATHERSON, Explanation, Idealisation and the Goldilocks Problem Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. ,vol. 84, pp. 461- 473 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1933-1592.2011.00574.X
James Woodward, The problem of variable choice Synthese. ,vol. 193, pp. 1047- 1072 ,(2016) , 10.1007/S11229-015-0810-5
L. R. Franklin-Hall, High-Level Explanation and the Interventionist’s ‘Variables Problem’ The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. ,vol. 67, pp. 553- 577 ,(2016) , 10.1093/BJPS/AXU040
James Woodward, Interventionism and Causal Exclusion Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. ,vol. 91, pp. 303- 347 ,(2015) , 10.1111/PHPR.12095
Joseph Y. Halpern, Christopher Hitchcock, Graded Causation and Defaults The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. ,vol. 66, pp. 413- 457 ,(2015) , 10.1093/BJPS/AXT050
James Woodward, Christopher Hitchcock, Explanatory Generalizations, Part I: A Counterfactual Account Noûs. ,vol. 37, pp. 1- 24 ,(2003) , 10.1111/1468-0068.00426
David Lewis, Scorekeeping in a Language Game Journal of Philosophical Logic. ,vol. 8, pp. 339- 359 ,(1979) , 10.1007/BF00258436