The phase II/III transition : Toward the proof of efficacy in cancer clinical trials

作者: Melissa Fazzari , Glenn Heller , Howard I Scher

DOI: 10.1016/S0197-2456(00)00056-8

关键词:

摘要: Few phase III investigations show a benefit for an experimental treatment when compared to standard therapy or placebo. This illustrates the need more reliable estimates of effects from II used design definitive trials. In this manuscript, we examine four aspects clinical trial designs: (1) selecting endpoints; (2) defining patient population evaluation; (3) determining level activity that would justify trial; and (4) estimating sample sizes. each area, problems with conventional approaches are discussed alternatives successful transition results setting suggested. An application patients androgen-independent prostate cancer is illustrated.

参考文章(7)
Robert J Tibshirani, Bradley Efron, An introduction to the bootstrap ,(1993)
Thomas R. Fleming, Surrogate End Points in Clinical Trials: Are We Being Misled? Annals of Internal Medicine. ,vol. 125, pp. 605- 613 ,(1996) , 10.7326/0003-4819-125-7-199610010-00011
Ross L. Prentice, Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: definition and operational criteria Statistics in Medicine. ,vol. 8, pp. 431- 440 ,(1989) , 10.1002/SIM.4780080407
Peter F. Thall, Richard Simon, Incorporating historical control data in planning phase II clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine. ,vol. 9, pp. 215- 228 ,(1990) , 10.1002/SIM.4780090304
Howard I Scher, WM Kevin Kelly, Zuo-Feng Zhang, Peter Ouyang, Min Sun, Morton Schwartz, Cliff Ding, Weiping Wang, Ivan D Horak, Alton B Kremer, Post-therapy serum prostate-specific antigen level and survival in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer Journal of the National Cancer Institute. ,vol. 91, pp. 244- 251 ,(1999) , 10.1093/JNCI/91.3.244