Fertilidad después del tratamiento laparoscópico del embarazo ectópico, en la Clínica del Prado en Medellín, Colombia. Estudio de cohorte

作者: José F De los Ríos , Enrique Sánchez , Gabriel J Matta , Mauricio Jaramillo , Adriana M Arango

DOI: 10.18597/RCOG.438

关键词:

摘要: Objective:  obtaining and comparing fertility rates after laparoscopic salpingostomy salpingectomy in patients suffering ectopic pregnancy. Sample design:  a concurrent cohort of being operated on by laparoscopy for pregnancy the Clinica del Prado’s Gynecological Endoscopic Surgery unit, Medellin, Colombia. Methods:  reviewing medical records conducting telephone questionnaire who matched inclusion criteria. Main outcomes:  overall intrauterine rate, cumulative recurrence persistence rate. Results:  rate 31 following was 54.8% compared to 57.1% 14 group (p=0.88). Recurrence were 10.5% 20% (p=0.77). There 9.6% group. Conclusions : present study did not demonstrate statistically significant difference reproductive outcome laparoscopically managed either or salpingectomy.

参考文章(26)
M Vermesh, G T Fossum, A L Stein, M V Sauer, P D Silva, G F Rosen, Management of unruptured ectopic gestation by linear salpingostomy: a prospective, randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy versus laparotomy. Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 73, pp. 400- 404 ,(1989)
Per Lundorff, Mats Hahlin, Björn Källfelt, Jane Thorburn, Bo Lindblom, Adhesion formation after laparoscopic surgery in tubal pregnancy: a randomized trial versus laparotomy Fertility and Sterility. ,vol. 55, pp. 911- 915 ,(1991) , 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)54298-8
H. Saint-Amand, V. Hopirtean, O. Jourdain, D. Dallay, Fertility after laparoscopic treatment of ectopic pregnancy in a series of 138 patients Journal De Gynecologie Obstetrique Et Biologie De La Reproduction. ,vol. 30, pp. 265- 271 ,(2001)
Jim Parker, Andrew Bisits, Laparoscopic surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy: salpingectomy or salpingostomy? Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. ,vol. 37, pp. 115- 117 ,(1997) , 10.1111/J.1479-828X.1997.TB02232.X
Ingo Clausen, Conservative versus radical surgery for tubal pregnancy: A review Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. ,vol. 75, pp. 8- 12 ,(1996) , 10.3109/00016349609033276
Anton Langebrekke, Torgrim Sørnes, Arne Urnes, Fertility outcome after treatment of tubal pregnancy by laparoscopic laser surgery Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. ,vol. 72, pp. 547- 549 ,(1993) , 10.3109/00016349309058161
J. Bouyer, N. Job-Spira, J. L. Pouly, J. Coste, E. Germain, H. Fernandez, Fertility following radical, conservative-surgical or medical treatment for tubal pregnancy: a population-based study. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 107, pp. 714- 721 ,(2000) , 10.1111/J.1471-0528.2000.TB13330.X
Amélie Gervaise, Laurent Masson, Renaud de Tayrac, René Frydman, Hervé Fernandez, Reproductive outcome after methotrexate treatment of tubal pregnancies. Fertility and Sterility. ,vol. 82, pp. 304- 308 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.FERTNSTERT.2004.04.023
Martin C Sowter, Cindy M Farquhar, Ectopic pregnancy: an update. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 16, pp. 289- 293 ,(2004) , 10.1097/01.GCO.0000136494.49334.6B