Water–Rock Geochemical Considerations for Aquifer Storage and Recovery: Florida Case Studies

作者: J.D. Arthur , A.A. Dabous , J.B. Cowart

DOI: 10.1016/S0167-5648(05)52024-0

关键词:

摘要: Publisher Summary This chapter investigates the three aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) facilities in Southwest Florida to understand water–rock geochemical interactions during ASR process. Mobilization of metals from Floridan Aquifer System (FAS) matrix activities is apparent likely due a complex interaction processes. The chemically heterogeneous contains metal-rich phases sufficient amounts become mobilized by oxidation or other processes yield concentrations recovered waters that may exceed maximum contaminant levels (MCLs). Arsenian pyrite among sources arsenic trace aquifer; however, preliminary sequential extraction studies work researchers suggest such as organics contain As metals. Moreover, organic material uranium, which also thought be associated with carbonate minerals Suwannee Limestone. Water-quality data more than 15 cycle tests Southwestern indicate significant mobilization into stored water ASR.

参考文章(8)
R V. Nicholson, R.W Gillham, E.J Reardon, Pyrite oxidation in carbonate-buffered solution: 2. Rate control by oxide coatings Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. ,vol. 54, pp. 395- 402 ,(1990) , 10.1016/0016-7037(90)90328-I
RP Thomas, Alan M Ure, CM Davidson, David Littlejohn, G Rauret, R Rubio, JF López-Sánchez, None, Three-stage sequential extraction procedure for the determination of metals in river sediments Analytica Chimica Acta. ,vol. 286, pp. 423- 429 ,(1994) , 10.1016/0003-2670(94)85088-7
June E. Mirecki, Bruce G. Campbell, Kevin J. Conlon, Matthew D. Petkewich, Solute Changes During Aquifer Storage Recovery Testing in a Limestone/Clastic Aquifer. Ground Water. ,vol. 36, pp. 394- 403 ,(1998) , 10.1111/J.1745-6584.1998.TB02809.X