Assessment of the safety of selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors: where are we in 2003?

作者: Yuhong Yuan , Richard H. Hunt

DOI: 10.1163/156856003322699528

关键词:

摘要: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most widely used worldwide despite their well-documented adverse gastrointestinal (GI) effects. The risk of developing a severe GI event varies from patient to and NSAID NSAID. Selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors (coxibs) have been designed similar efficacy but less toxicity than traditional NSAIDs, shown an improved tolerability events across range different safety assessments. In clinical trials, particularly VIGOR CLASS, rofecoxib celecoxib, respectively, significantly reduce ulcers ulcer complications nonselective comparators with rates comparable placebo. real benefit coxib comes sparing thromboxane hence preservation normal platelet function. Thus, there is bleeding selective inhibition COX-2, which common serious complication non-selective NSAIDs. Moreover, can occur anywhere in tract. Although some concern has raised about cardiovascular coxibs, when recommended doses, no convincing evidence that patients treated increased thrombotic events. Different approaches advocated minimize NSAID-related toxicity. Choice harmful NSAIDs such as one strategies promoted guidelines. introduction coxibs higher benefit-risk ratio dramatically changed therapeutic scenario for treatment practice.

参考文章(101)
Singh G, Rosen Ramey D, NSAID induced gastrointestinal complications: the ARAMIS perspective--1997. Arthritis, Rheumatism, and Aging Medical Information System. The Journal of Rheumatology Supplement. ,vol. 51, pp. 8- 16 ,(1998)
Neal M. Davies, Sustained release and enteric coated NSAIDs: are they really GI safe? Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences. ,vol. 2, pp. 5- 14 ,(1999)
David P Recker, Glenn Eisen, William W Zhao, Alan Kivitz, Terry Bevirt, Randomized placebo-controlled trial comparing efficacy and safety of valdecoxib with naproxen in patients with osteoarthritis. Journal of Family Practice. ,vol. 51, pp. 530- 537 ,(2002)
Graham Dy, Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, Helicobacter pylori, and ulcers: where we stand. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. ,vol. 91, pp. 2080- 2086 ,(1996)
Inge de Lepeleire, Marleen Depré, Kathleen Wynants, Anne van Hecken, Agnes Buntinx, Jef Arnout, Barry J. Gertz, David L. Ebel, Aimee Dallob, Peggy H. Wong, Jules I. Schwartz, Wesley Tanaka, Paul J. de Schepper, Comparative inhibitory activity of rofecoxib, meloxicam, diclofenac, ibuprofen, and naproxen on COX-2 versus COX-1 in healthy volunteers. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. ,vol. 40, pp. 1109- 1120 ,(2000) , 10.1177/009127000004001005
C C Chan, I W Rodger, Y Girard, D Riendeau, J P Falgueyret, C Brideau, D Ethier, M Gresser, R W Friesen, E Wong, S Boyce, M D Percival, D Dubé, P Prasit, D Visco, A W Ford-Hutchinson, J Mancini, S Charleson, G Greig, J Guay, R Zamboni, M Ouellet, L Xu, R N Young, R Gordon, Etoricoxib (MK-0663): Preclinical Profile and Comparison with Other Agents That Selectively Inhibit Cyclooxygenase-2 Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. ,vol. 296, pp. 558- 566 ,(2001)
Kenneth C. Lasseter, Francesca Catella-Lawson, Briggs W. Morrison, Barry J. Gertz, Shiv Kapoor, Garret A. Fitzgerald, Brendan McAdam, Dean Kujubu, Hui Quan, Lisa Antes, Effects of specific inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 on sodium balance, hemodynamics, and vasoactive eicosanoids. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. ,vol. 289, pp. 735- 741 ,(1999)
Walter E. Smalley, Wayne A. Ray, James R. Daugherty, Marie R. Griffin, Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and the Incidence of Hospitalizations for Peptic Ulcer Disease in Elderly Persons American Journal of Epidemiology. ,vol. 141, pp. 539- 545 ,(1995) , 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.AJE.A117469
Deborah Layton, Jane Riley, Lynda V. Wilton, Saad A. W. Shakir, Safety profile of rofecoxib as used in general practice in England: results of a prescription-event monitoring study. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. ,vol. 55, pp. 166- 174 ,(2003) , 10.1046/J.1365-2125.2003.01763.X