The Environmental Justice Movement: Equitable Allocation of the Costs and Benefits of Environmental Management Outcomes

作者: David N. Pellow , Adam Weinberg , Allan Schnaiberg

DOI: 10.1023/A:1014654813111

关键词:

摘要: We present a review of theoretical and methodological advances in the social scientific literature on environmental inequality/racism argue for new directions research efforts that pay more attention to (1) historical forces driving justice conflicts; (2) complex role stakeholders these struggles; (3) inequality, particularly trade-offs between protection equity; (4) impact movement activity state protection. Drawing case study an conflict United States, we find inequality impacts many actors with often contradictory cross-cutting allegiances. These struggles therefore become moving drama—a process—rather than cross-sectional outcome. conclude analysis global scale transnational capital remains largely untheorized literature. suggest models explaining inequality's causes consequences.

参考文章(14)
Mary Tiemann, Waste Trade and the Basel Convention: Background and Update Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service.. ,(1998)
Susan Caris, Brian Joe Lobley Berry, The social burdens of environmental pollution : a comparative metropolitan data source Ballinger Pub. Co.. ,(1977)
Robert D. Bullard, Glenn S. Johnson, Just transportation : dismantling race and class barriers to mobility New Society. ,(1997)
Joseph J. Seneca, Peter Asch, Some Evidence on the Distribution of Air Quality Land Economics. ,vol. 54, pp. 278- 297 ,(1978)
Douglas L. Anderton, Andy B. Anderson, John Michael Oakes, Michael R. Fraser, Environmental equity: the demographics of dumping. Demography. ,vol. 31, pp. 229- 248 ,(1994) , 10.2307/2061884
ANDREW SZASZ, MICHAEL MEUSER, Unintended, Inexorable: The Production of Environmental Inequalities in Santa Clara County, California American Behavioral Scientist. ,vol. 43, pp. 602- 632 ,(2000) , 10.1177/0002764200043004005