Theorizing Dialogue among Various Voices in Critical Theory

作者: Joseph Zanoni

DOI: 10.1057/9781137490865_2

关键词:

摘要: We may judge theories and discourse in early childhood human capital by how useful they are for explaining practice not abstruse are. Given expanding alignments of knowledge, technology, critique, one grand counter narrative could satisfy our needs (Lyotard, 1984). The aims educational inquiry be understood developing frameworks dimensionality recognizing hybrid or overlapping social theories. palimpsest process history shows the paradigm shifts theoretical legacies position us now to unpack contemporary moment propose paths future practice.

参考文章(45)
Joseph P Zanoni, Confronting Inequity: Participatory Education Impacting Health At Work Journal of Critical Thought and Praxis. ,vol. 2, pp. 4- ,(2013) , 10.31274/JCTP-180810-4
Kylie Smith, Gramsci at the margins: subjectivity and subalternity in a theory of hegemony International Gramsci Journal. ,vol. 1, pp. 39- 50 ,(2010)
Joseph P. Zanoni, Dialogue and hegemony : sociolinguistic analysis of 'Charlas' for critique and praxis University of Malta. Euro-Mediterranean Centre for Educational Research. ,(2008)
Bruce Curtis, Foucault on Governmentality and Population: The Impossible Discovery * Canadian Journal of Sociology. ,vol. 27, pp. 505- 533 ,(2002) , 10.2307/3341588
Graham Burchell, Michel Foucault, Colin Gordon, Miller, Peter, Ph. D., The Foucault effect : studies in governmentality : with two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault University of Chicago Press. ,(1991)
Roland Sintos Coloma, Who's Afraid of Foucault? History, Theory, and Becoming Subjects History of Education Quarterly. ,vol. 51, pp. 184- 210 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1748-5959.2011.00329.X