The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments.

作者: Chris Oriet , Ryan J. Fitzgerald

DOI: 10.1037/LHB0000272

关键词:

摘要: The suspect in eyewitness lineups may be guilty or innocent. These possibilities are traditionally simulated identification studies using a dual-lineup paradigm: All witnesses observe the same perpetrator and then receive one of two lineups. In this paradigm, suspect's guilt is manipulated by including lineup an innocent other. filled with people matched to either (resulting different fillers perpetrator-present perpetrator-absent lineups) each lineup). An inescapable feature paradigm that differ not only guilt, but also their composition. Here, we describe single-lineup Subjects perpetrators all subjects containing perpetrators. This alternative allows manipulation without changing lineup's three experiments, applied explore suspect-filler similarity consistently found increasing reduced identifications did little prevent misidentifications. Conversely, when were suspects. finding suggests effect filler depend on person whom matched. We suggest more ecologically valid better controlled approach creating suspect-matched laboratory investigations memory than existing procedures. (PsycINFO Database Record

参考文章(27)
R. C. L. Lindsay, Gary L. Wells, What price justice? Exploring the relationship of lineup fairness to identification accuracy. Law and Human Behavior. ,vol. 4, pp. 303- 313 ,(1980) , 10.1007/BF01040622
Ryan J. Fitzgerald, Heather L. Price, Chris Oriet, Steve D. Charman, The Effect of Suspect-Filler Similarity on Eyewitness Identification Decisions: A Meta-Analysis Psychology, Public Policy and Law. ,vol. 19, pp. 151- 164 ,(2013) , 10.1037/A0030618
Gary L. Wells, Paul D. Windschitl, Stimulus Sampling and Social Psychological Experimentation Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. ,vol. 25, pp. 1115- 1125 ,(1999) , 10.1177/01461672992512005
Amina Memon, Lorraine Hope, Ray Bull, Exposure duration: Effects on eyewitness accuracy and confidence British Journal of Psychology. ,vol. 94, pp. 339- 354 ,(2003) , 10.1348/000712603767876262
Vicki Bruce, Zoë Henderson, Karen Greenwood, Peter J. B. Hancock, A. Mike Burton, Paul Miller, Verification of face identities from images captured on video. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. ,vol. 5, pp. 339- 360 ,(1999) , 10.1037/1076-898X.5.4.339
Steven E. Clark, Ryan T. Howell, Sherrie L. Davey, Regularities in Eyewitness Identification Law and Human Behavior. ,vol. 32, pp. 187- 218 ,(2008) , 10.1007/S10979-006-9082-4
A. Mike Burton, David White, Allan McNeill, The Glasgow Face Matching Test. Behavior Research Methods. ,vol. 42, pp. 286- 291 ,(2010) , 10.3758/BRM.42.1.286
Steven E. Clark, Costs and Benefits of Eyewitness Identification Reform: Psychological Science and Public Policy. Perspectives on Psychological Science. ,vol. 7, pp. 238- 259 ,(2012) , 10.1177/1745691612439584
Colin G. Tredoux, Statistical inference on measures of lineup fairness. Law and Human Behavior. ,vol. 22, pp. 217- 237 ,(1998) , 10.1023/A:1025746220886
R. C. Lindsay, Harold Wallbridge, Daphne Drennan, Do the clothes make the man? An exploration of the effect of lineup attire on eyewitness identification accuracy. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science. ,vol. 19, pp. 463- 478 ,(1987) , 10.1037/H0079998