Trust and Justice in Big Data Analytics: Bringing the Philosophical Literature on Trust to Bear on the Ethics of Consent

作者: J. Patrick Woolley

DOI: 10.1007/S13347-017-0288-9

关键词:

摘要: Much bioethical literature and policy guidances for big data analytics in biomedical research emphasize the importance of trust. It is essential that potential participants trust so they will allow their to be used further research. However, comparatively, little guidance offered as what trustworthy oversight mechanisms are, or how should support them, are collected, shared, used. Generally, “trust” not characterized well enough, meaningfully term systematically applied development. Yet points made philosophical on can help. They us, only better distinguish different ways may interpreted, but also determine approaches align with governance—in relate key concepts related laws, help balance individual group interests sharing. This article draws from identify a relationship among consent, trust, justice. Specifically, parallels drawn between “character-trustworthiness” “natural justice,” set widely held legal safeguards intended ensure decision-makers follow pattern procedural fairness which protects rights thereby maintains public confidence decision-making process. Relevance traditional principles, established consent procedures addressed throughout. In conclusion, actions suggested.

参考文章(46)
Brent Daniel Mittelstadt, Luciano Floridi, The Ethics of Big Data: Current and Foreseeable Issues in Biomedical Contexts Science and Engineering Ethics. ,vol. 22, pp. 303- 341 ,(2016) , 10.1007/S11948-015-9652-2
Daniel Neyland, Bearing Account-able Witness to the Ethical Algorithmic System: Science, Technology, & Human Values. ,vol. 41, pp. 50- 76 ,(2016) , 10.1177/0162243915598056
Onora O'Neill, Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics ,(2002)
Jane Kaye, Edgar A Whitley, David Lund, Michael Morrison, Harriet Teare, Karen Melham, Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks European Journal of Human Genetics. ,vol. 23, pp. 141- 146 ,(2015) , 10.1038/EJHG.2014.71
Thomas W. Simpson, What Is Trust Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. ,vol. 93, pp. 550- 569 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1468-0114.2012.01438.X
Thomas W. Simpson, Trustworthiness and Moral Character Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. ,vol. 16, pp. 543- 557 ,(2013) , 10.1007/S10677-012-9373-4
Jonathan Wolff, Five Types of Risky Situation Law, Innovation and Technology. ,vol. 2, pp. 151- 163 ,(2010) , 10.5235/175799610794046177
John P. A. Ioannidis, Informed Consent, Big Data, and the Oxymoron of Research That Is Not Research American Journal of Bioethics. ,vol. 13, pp. 40- 42 ,(2013) , 10.1080/15265161.2013.768864