Flexibility, Rigidity, and Adaptation: Toward Clarification of Concepts

作者: William A. Scott

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-40230-6_16

关键词:

摘要: One of the most striking manifestations rigidity among psychologists is their persistent clinging to discredited concepts, such as “rigidity.” Consideration a construct likely generate discussion syntactics rather than semantics: study language habits people who use concept, events which concept refers. imaginative and clear-thinking contributors this topic, Raymond Cattell, has called attention “the confusion that will persist so long some fail recognize in using same term ‘rigidity’ they are assuming single characteristic or process where, fact, there several.” (Cattell Tiner, 1949, p. 321).

参考文章(47)
T. L. Jacobsen, J. J. Asher, Validity of the concept constancy measure of creative problem solving. Journal of General Psychology. ,vol. 68, pp. 9- 19 ,(1963) , 10.1080/00221309.1963.9920506
Milton Rokeach, The Open and Closed Mind ,(1960)
David G. Ryans, The Meaning of Persistence Journal of General Psychology. ,vol. 19, pp. 79- 96 ,(1938) , 10.1080/00221309.1938.9711188
ELSE FRENKEL-BRUNSWIK, INTOLERANCE OF AMBIGUITY AS AN EMOTIONAL AND PERCEPTUAL PERSONALITY VARIABLE Journal of Personality. ,vol. 18, pp. 108- 143 ,(1949) , 10.1111/J.1467-6494.1949.TB01236.X
J. A. Hamilton, I. Krechevsky, Studies in the effect of shock upon behavior plasticity in the rat. Journal of Comparative Psychology. ,vol. 16, pp. 237- 253 ,(1933) , 10.1037/H0072669
Charles Spearman, The abilities of man ,(1927)
Abraham S. Luchins, Mechanization in problem solving: The effect of Einstellung. Psychological Monographs. ,vol. 54, pp. i- 95 ,(1942) , 10.1037/H0093502