A Historical Analysis of the "Marriage Tax Penalty"

作者: John Brozovsky , A. J. Cataldo

DOI: 10.2308/0148-4184.21.1.163

关键词:

摘要: The marriage tax penalty resurfaces as a topic of interest when policy makers consider the economic consequences increasing marginal rates on declining “family values”. Aim and Whittington [1993] found that taxes influence incidence marriage. A historical perspective its counterpart, bonus or “subsidy”, merit consideration re-evaluation in light current trends toward higher rates. This paper develops framework for study federal income conducts detailed analysis first quartile, weighted average, third quartile taxpayers over entire history United States personal tax. It demonstrates potential bonuses have historically been consistently more significant than penalties. In fact, penalties do not gain prominence until 1964. trend will increase both bonus. T...

参考文章(8)
Michael J. McINTYRE, ROSEN'S MARRIAGE TAX COMPUTATIONS: WHAT DO THEY MEAN? National Tax Journal. ,vol. 41, pp. 257- 258 ,(1988) , 10.1086/NTJ41788726
Douglas W. Mitchell, The Marriage Tax Penalty and Subsidy Under Tax Reform Eastern Economic Journal. ,vol. 15, pp. 113- 116 ,(1989)
Deenie Kinder Neff, Married Women's Labor Supply and the Marriage Penalty Public Finance Review. ,vol. 18, pp. 420- 432 ,(1990) , 10.1177/109114219001800403
Joseph A. Pechman, Federal tax policy ,(1966)
Jane M. Fraser, The Marriage Tax Management Science. ,vol. 32, pp. 831- 840 ,(1986) , 10.1287/MNSC.32.7.831
Harvey S. Rosen, THINKING ABOUT THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF MARRIAGE National Tax Journal. ,vol. 41, pp. 259- 260 ,(1988) , 10.1086/NTJ41788727
Harold M. Groves, Federal tax treatment of the family ,(1963)
J. M. Maguire, Arnold R. Baar, KixMiller, Baar, 1927 United States Income and War Tax Guide Harvard Law Review. ,vol. 41, pp. 117- ,(1927) , 10.2307/1330439