A checklist for managed access programmes for reimbursement co-designed by Canadian patients and caregivers.

作者: Andrea Young , Devidas Menon , Jackie Street , Walla Al-Hertani , Tania Stafinski

DOI: 10.1111/HEX.12690

关键词:

摘要: INTRODUCTION Reimbursement decisions on orphan drugs carry significant uncertainty, and as the amount increases, so does risk of making a wrong decision, where harms outweigh benefits. Consequently, patients often face limited access to drugs. Managed programmes (MAPs) are mechanism for managing while enabling potentially beneficial Patients their caregivers have expressed support these see patient input critical successful implementation. However, they yet be systematically involved in design. OBJECTIVE The aim this study was co-design with tool development managed programmes. METHODS Building upon established relationships Canadian Organization Rare Disorders, project team collaborated using principles participatory action research. Data were collected at two workshops analysed thematic network approach. RESULTS co-designed checklist comprised six aspects an ideal MAP relating accountability (programme goals); governance (MAP-specific committee oversight, input, international collaboration); evidence collection (outcome measures continuation criteria, on-going monitoring registries). They recognized that health-care resources finite considered disease or drug eligibility criteria deciding when use (eg treating diseases which there no other legitimate alternatives). CONCLUSIONS A caregiver-designed created, emphasized involvement transparency. Further research is needed examine feasibility roles stakeholders.

参考文章(15)
Marianne Klemp, Katrine B. Frønsdal, Karen Facey, What principles should govern the use of managed entry agreements International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. ,vol. 27, pp. 77- 83 ,(2011) , 10.1017/S0266462310001297
Zahava R.S. Rosenberg-Yunger, Abdallah S. Daar, Halla Thorsteinsdóttir, Douglas K. Martin, Priority setting for orphan drugs: an international comparison. Health Policy. ,vol. 100, pp. 25- 34 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.HEALTHPOL.2010.09.008
Nancy Kraetschmer, Natasha Sharpe, Sara Urowitz, Raisa B. Deber, How does trust affect patient preferences for participation in decision-making? Health Expectations. ,vol. 7, pp. 317- 326 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.1369-7625.2004.00296.X
Jeannette Winkelhage, Margrit Schreier, Adele Diederich, Priority setting in health care: Attitudes of physicians and patients Health. ,vol. 2013, pp. 712- 719 ,(2013) , 10.4236/HEALTH.2013.54094
Kiran N. Meekings, Cory S.M. Williams, John E. Arrowsmith, Orphan drug development: an economically viable strategy for biopharma R&D. Drug Discovery Today. ,vol. 17, pp. 660- 664 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.DRUDIS.2012.02.005
Maria Mavris, Fabrizia Bignami, EURORDIS Summer School for patient advocates in clinical trials and drug development Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases. ,vol. 5, pp. 3- ,(2010) , 10.1186/1750-1172-5-S1-P3
Christopher J. McCabe, Tania Stafinski, Richard Edlin, Devidas Menon, Access with evidence development schemes: a framework for description and evaluation. PharmacoEconomics. ,vol. 28, pp. 143- 152 ,(2010) , 10.2165/11530850-000000000-00000
Jaklin Eliott, Ian Olver, The Discursive Properties of “Hope”: A Qualitative Analysis of Cancer Patients’ Speech Qualitative Health Research. ,vol. 12, pp. 173- 193 ,(2002) , 10.1177/104973230201200204
Thomas Morel, Francis Arickx, Gustaf Befrits, Paolo Siviero, Caroline van der Meijden, Entela Xoxi, Steven Simoens, Reconciling uncertainty of costs and outcomes with the need for access to orphan medicinal products: a comparative study of managed entry agreements across seven European countries Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases. ,vol. 8, pp. 198- 198 ,(2013) , 10.1186/1750-1172-8-198