With a little help from an anchor

作者: N.J.A. van Exel , W.B.F. Brouwer , B. van den Berg , M.A. Koopmanschap

DOI: 10.1016/J.SOCEC.2005.11.045

关键词:

摘要: Contingent valuation enjoys increasing popularity among transport, environmental and health economists, though the method has often been criticized. We discuss main points of controversy, with a focus on anchoring effects. Available literature indicates that higher ambiguity, lower familiarity, relevance or involvement problem, more trustworthy source plausible bid tend to be associated stronger In two studies informal caregivers we found respondents use all sorts anchors when eliciting their value time. end discussion substantive significance CV for economics.

参考文章(66)
Peter J Neumann, Gillian D Sanders, Louise B Russell, Joanna E Siegel, Theodore G Ganiats, None, Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine Oxford University Press. ,(1996)
Jan Abel Olsen, Cam Donaldson, João Pereira, The insensitivity of `willingness-to-pay' to the size of the good: New evidence for health care Journal of Economic Psychology. ,vol. 25, pp. 445- 460 ,(2004) , 10.1016/S0167-4870(03)00029-1
Peter A Diamond, Jerry A Hausman, Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number? Journal of Economic Perspectives. ,vol. 8, pp. 45- 64 ,(1994) , 10.1257/JEP.8.4.45
Robin M Hogarth, Melvin W Reder, None, Rational Choice: The Contrast Between Economics and Psychology ,(1987)
Baruch Fischhoff, Value elicitation: Is there anything in there? American Psychologist. ,vol. 46, pp. 835- 847 ,(1991) , 10.1037/0003-066X.46.8.835
William Samuelson, Richard Zeckhauser, Status quo bias in decision making Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. ,vol. 1, pp. 7- 59 ,(1988) , 10.1007/BF00055564
Thomas Klose, The contingent valuation method in health care Health Policy. ,vol. 47, pp. 97- 123 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0168-8510(99)00010-X
David K. Whynes, Jane L. Wolstenholme, Emma Frew, Evidence of range bias in contingent valuation payment scales. Health Economics. ,vol. 13, pp. 183- 190 ,(2004) , 10.1002/HEC.809
Emma J. Frew, Jane L. Wolstenholme, David K. Whynes, Comparing willingness-to-pay: bidding game format versus open-ended and payment scale formats. Health Policy. ,vol. 68, pp. 289- 298 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.HEALTHPOL.2003.10.003