Economic and biological costs of cardiac imaging.

作者: Eugenio Picano

DOI: 10.1186/1476-7120-3-13

关键词:

摘要: Medical imaging market consists of several billion tests per year worldwide. Out these, at least one third are cardiovascular procedures. Keeping in mind that each test represents a cost, often risk, and diagnostic hypothesis, we can agree every unnecessary unjustifiable is too many. Small individual costs, risks, wastes multiplied by billions examinations represent an important population, society environmental burden. Unfortunately, the appropriateness cardiac extra-ordinarily low there little awareness patients physicians differential radiological doses, long term risks different modalities. For resting test, being average cost (not charges) echocardiogram equal to 1 (as comparator), CT 3.1x, SPECT 3.27x, Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 5.51x, PET 14.03x, right left heart catheterization 19.96x. stress imaging, compared with treadmill exercise echocardiography 2.1x scintigraphy 5.7x. Biohazards downstream long-term costs linked radiation-induced oncogenesis should also be considered. The radiation exposure absent echo magnetic resonance, corresponds 500 chest x rays for sestamibi scan 1150 thallium scan. corresponding extra-risk lifetime fatal cancer 2000 exposed 1000 Increased economic, biologic, will hopefully lead greater appropriateness, wisdom prudence from both prescriber practitioner. In this way, sustainability eventually improve.

参考文章(31)
R. Smith, H. Hiatt, D. Berwick, Tavistock Group, Shared ethical principles for everybody in health care: a working draft from the Tavistock group. BMJ. ,vol. 318, pp. 248- 251 ,(1999) , 10.1136/BMJ.318.7178.248
Sam Sanjiv Gambhir, Peter Josef Ell, Nuclear medicine in clinical diagnosis and treatment (3rd ed.). Churchill Livingstone: Edinburgh. (2004). ,(1994)
Eugenio Picano, Stress echocardiography: a historical perspective. The American Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 114, pp. 126- 130 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0002-9343(02)01427-4
Peter Herzog, Christina T Rieger, Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays. The Lancet. ,vol. 363, pp. 340- 341 ,(2004) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15470-6
Eugenio Picano, Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays The Lancet. ,vol. 363, pp. 1909- 1910 ,(2004) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16373-3
Maria Joao Correia, Arianna Hellies, Maria Grazia Andreassi, Bruno Ghelarducci, Eugenio Picano, Lack of radiological awareness among physicians working in a tertiary-care cardiological centre. International Journal of Cardiology. ,vol. 103, pp. 307- 311 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.IJCARD.2004.08.070
S Shiralkar, A Rennie, M Snow, RB Galland, MH Lewis, K Gower-Thomas, Doctors' knowledge of radiation exposure: questionnaire study BMJ. ,vol. 327, pp. 371- 372 ,(2003) , 10.1136/BMJ.327.7411.371
Eugenio Picano, Sustainability of medical imaging BMJ. ,vol. 328, pp. 578- 580 ,(2004) , 10.1136/BMJ.328.7439.578
Aharon Finestone, Tuvia Schlesinger, Hagay Amir, Elihu Richter, Charles Milgrom, Do physicians correctly estimate radiation risks from medical imaging Archives of Environmental Health. ,vol. 58, pp. 59- 61 ,(2003) , 10.3200/AEOH.58.1.59-62