The impact of fillers on lineup performance

作者: Stacy A. Wetmore , Ryan M. McAdoo , Scott D. Gronlund , Jeffrey S. Neuschatz

DOI: 10.1186/S41235-017-0084-1

关键词:

摘要: Filler siphoning theory posits that the presence of fillers (known innocents) in a lineup protects an innocent suspect from being chosen by choices away suspect. This mechanism has been proposed as explanation for why simultaneous lineups (viewing all members at once) induces better performance than showups (one-person identification procedures). We implemented filler computational model (WITNESS, Clark, Applied Cognitive Psychology 17:629–654, 2003), and explored impact number (lineup size) quality on sequential sequence), compared both to showups. In limited situations, we found can produce advantage, but one is insufficient magnitude explain empirical data. However, advantage be approximated once criterial variability added model. But this modification works negatively impacting rather promoting more siphoning. lineups, were harm performance. fails clarify relationship between or By incorporating constructs like into model, trying approximate data, sort through explanations eyewitness decision-making, prerequisite policy recommendations.

参考文章(40)
Scott D. Gronlund, Laura Mickes, John T. Wixted, Steven E. Clark, Conducting an Eyewitness Lineup: How the Research Got It Wrong Psychology of Learning and Motivation. ,vol. 63, pp. 1- 43 ,(2015) , 10.1016/BS.PLM.2015.03.003
Gary L. Wells, Andrew M. Smith, Laura Smalarz, ROC analysis of lineups obscures information that is critical for both theoretical understanding and applied purposes Journal of applied research in memory and cognition. ,vol. 4, pp. 324- 328 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.JARMAC.2015.08.010
Stephan Lewandowsky, The Rewards and Hazards of Computer Simulations Psychological Science. ,vol. 4, pp. 236- 243 ,(1993) , 10.1111/J.1467-9280.1993.TB00267.X
Curt A. Carlson, Scott D. Gronlund, Steven E. Clark, Lineup composition, suspect position, and the sequential lineup advantage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. ,vol. 14, pp. 118- 128 ,(2008) , 10.1037/1076-898X.14.2.118
John T. Wixted, Vincent Stretch, In defense of the signal detection interpretation of remember/know judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. ,vol. 11, pp. 616- 641 ,(2004) , 10.3758/BF03196616
Charles A. Goodsell, Scott D. Gronlund, Curt A. Carlson, Exploring the Sequential Lineup Advantage Using WITNESS Law and Human Behavior. ,vol. 34, pp. 445- 459 ,(2010) , 10.1007/S10979-009-9215-7
Steven E. Clark, Scott D. Gronlund, Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. ,vol. 3, pp. 37- 60 ,(1996) , 10.3758/BF03210740
Scott D. Gronlund, Curt A. Carlson, Sarah B. Dailey, Charles A. Goodsell, Robustness of the sequential lineup advantage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. ,vol. 15, pp. 140- 152 ,(2009) , 10.1037/A0015082
Steven E. Clark, Molly B. Moreland, Scott D. Gronlund, Evolution of the empirical and theoretical foundations of eyewitness identification reform Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. ,vol. 21, pp. 251- 267 ,(2014) , 10.3758/S13423-013-0516-Y
Steven E. Clark, Costs and Benefits of Eyewitness Identification Reform: Psychological Science and Public Policy. Perspectives on Psychological Science. ,vol. 7, pp. 238- 259 ,(2012) , 10.1177/1745691612439584