The Middlemost Choice on Attitude Items Ambivalence, Neutrality, or Uncertainty?

作者: Frederick J. Klopfer , Theodore M. Madden

DOI: 10.1177/014616728061014

关键词:

摘要: If respondents to a Thurstone-type attitude scale can make middlemost response, in addition agreement or disagreement, what concept underlies such responses when they are made? Ambivalence, neutrality, and uncertainty three processes that determine choice of the response. Definitions reflecting one these an innocuous control definition were presented subjects as appropriate for response on each two scales. The definitions differentially affected use On scale, ambivalence yielded greatest differed from definition, which least use.

参考文章(8)
Rebecca F. Guy, Melissa Norvell, The neutral point on a Likert scale. The Journal of Psychology. ,vol. 95, pp. 199- 204 ,(1977) , 10.1080/00223980.1977.9915880
Theodore M. Madden, Frederick J. Klopfer, The "Cannot Decide" Option in Thurstone-Type Attitude Scales Educational and Psychological Measurement. ,vol. 38, pp. 259- 264 ,(1978) , 10.1177/001316447803800207
Bernard Dubois, John A. Burns, An Analysis of the Meaning of the Question Mark Response Category in Attitude Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement. ,vol. 35, pp. 869- 884 ,(1975) , 10.1177/001316447503500414
Joe D. Francis, Lawrence Busch, What We Now Know About "I Don't Knows" Public Opinion Quarterly. ,vol. 39, pp. 207- 218 ,(1975) , 10.1086/268217
Clyde H. Coombs, Lolagene C. Coombs, “Don't Know” Item Ambiguity or Respondent Uncertainty? Public Opinion Quarterly. ,vol. 40, pp. 497- 514 ,(1976) , 10.1086/268336