ABDUCTION AND THE EXPLANATION OF ANOMALIES: THE CASE OF PROOF BY CONTRADICTION ♠
作者： Maria Alessandra Mariotti , Samuele Antonini
DOI:
关键词:
摘要: Some difficulties with proof by contradiction seem to be overcome when students spontaneously produce indirect argumentation. In this paper, we explore issue and discuss some differences between argumentation contradiction. We will highlight how an abductive process, involved in generating argumentation, can have important role explaining the absurd proposition, filling gap final statement proved treatment of impossible mathematical objects.
参考文章(23)
Maria G. Bartolini Bussi, Mathematical discussion and perspective drawing in primary school Educational Studies in Mathematics. ,vol. 31, pp. 11- 41 ,(1996) , 10.1007/BF00143925
G. Polya, A. Robson, How to Solve It ,(1945)
Samuele Antonini, A Statement, the Contrapositive and the Inverse: Intuition and Argumentation. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. ,(2004)
Denisse R. Thompson, Learning and Teaching Indirect Proof. Mathematics Teacher: Learning and Teaching PK–12. ,vol. 89, ,(1996)
Hans Freudenthal, Mathematics as an Educational Task ,(1972)
Stephen Edelston Toulmin, The uses of argument ,(1958)
Bettina Pedemonte, Argumentation and algebraic proof Zdm. ,vol. 40, pp. 385- 400 ,(2008) , 10.1007/S11858-008-0085-0
Samuele Antonini, Maria Alessandra Mariotti, Indirect proof: what is specific to this way of proving? Zdm. ,vol. 40, pp. 401- 412 ,(2008) , 10.1007/S11858-008-0091-2
Bettina Pedemonte, How can the relationship between argumentation and proof be analysed Educational Studies in Mathematics. ,vol. 66, pp. 23- 41 ,(2007) , 10.1007/S10649-006-9057-X
Andreas J. Stylianides, Gabriel J. Stylianides, George N. Philippou, Undergraduate students' understanding of the contraposition equivalence rule in symbolic and verbal contexts Educational Studies in Mathematics. ,vol. 55, pp. 133- 162 ,(2004) , 10.1023/B:EDUC.0000017671.47700.0B