25 years of research on the use of geometry in spatial reorientation: a current theoretical perspective.

摘要: The purpose of this article is to review and evaluate the range theories proposed explain findings on use geometry in reorientation. We consider five key approaches models associated with them and, course reviewing each approach, issues. First, we take up modularity theory itself, as recently revised by Lee Spelke (Cognitive Psychology, 61, 152-176, 2010a; Experimental Brain Research, 206, 179-188, 2010b). In context, discuss issues concerning basic distinction between features. Second, view-matching approach (Sturzl, Cheung, Cheng, & Zeil, Journal Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 34, 1-14, 2008). highlight possibility cross-species differences, well commonalities. Third, an associative (Miller Shettleworth, 33, 191-212, 2007; 419-422, focus phenomena cue competition. Fourth, adaptive combination (Newcombe Huttenlocher, 2006). discussing development effects experience. Fifth, examine various neurally based approaches, including frameworks Doeller Burgess (Proceedings National Academy Sciences United States America, 105, 5909-5914, 2008; Doeller, King, Burgess, Proceedings 5915-5920, 2008) Sheynikhovich, Chavarriaga, Strosslin, Arleo, Gerstner (Psychological Review, 116, 540-566, 2009). issue neural substrates spatial navigation. conclude that none these can account for all known reorientation clarify what challenges are approach.