Authors and Readers: The Keys to Success or Failure for Electronic Publishing

作者: Carol Tenopir

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: ALTHOUGH THERE ARE MANY POSSIBLE links and ways to join them in the publishing chain for scholarly journal articles, first last are always authors readers. Unless it satisfies motivations goals of both readers, electronic cannot com- pletely succeed. One most frequently cited advantages elec- tronic is loss distinction between readers au- thors shared motivation have more opportunities collaboration. Unfortunately, many not shared. Authors primarily motivated by career advance- ment long-term contributions their discipline, keep- ing up field work-related tasks. Many other factors enter into process as well-some which coincide while others conflict. INTRODUCTION The on commercial online sys- tems traditionally involves interrelated, but mostly separate, parts. These parts may be depicted steps leading a completed search request or, commonly, that together form an informa- tion generation use chain. Each component dependent others, whole leads something greater than Like value within company's operations, information generation/use forms system interdependent activities,

参考文章(27)
Charlene Schmidt Hurt, Sharon J. Rogers, How scholarly communication should work in the 21st century College & Research Libraries. ,vol. 51, ,(1990)
John Lubans, Scholars and Serials. american libraries. ,vol. 18, ,(1987)
Jorge J. E. Gracia, Can There Be Texts without Audiences? the Identity and Function of Audiences Review of Metaphysics. ,vol. 47, pp. 711- ,(1994)
William Potter, Readers in Search of Authors: The Changing Face of the Middleman. Wilson library bulletin. ,vol. 60, pp. 20- 23 ,(1986)
Thomas J. DeLoughry, Scholarly Journals in Electronic Form Seen as Means to Speed Pace of Publication and Promote Dialogue. The Chronicle of higher education. ,vol. 35, ,(1989)
Victor A. Millar, Michael E. Porter, How information gives you competitive advantage ,(1985)
Scott A. Shamp, Prospects for Electronic Publication in Communication: A Survey of Potential Users. Communication Quarterly. ,vol. 40, pp. 297- 304 ,(1992) , 10.1080/01463379209369844
Horace Freeland Judson, Structural Transformations of the Sciences and the End of Peer Review JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. ,vol. 272, pp. 92- 94 ,(1994) , 10.1001/JAMA.1994.03520020018004