Marginal bone loss around three different implant systems: radiographic evaluation after 1 year.

作者: C. M. PIAO , J. E. LEE , J. Y. KOAK , S. K. KIM , I. C. RHYU

DOI: 10.1111/J.1365-2842.2009.01988.X

关键词:

摘要: This study was designed to radiographically evaluate the effect of surface macro-and microstructures within coronal portion external hex implant at marginal bone change after loading. The fifty-four patients included in were randomly assigned treatment groups with rough-surface implants (TiUnite, n = 45), a hybrid smooth and rough (Restore, 45) or microthreads (Hexplant, 45). Clinical radiographic examinations conducted time loading (baseline) 1-year post-loading. A three-level mixed-effect ancova used test significance mean three from baseline follow-up. At 1-year, significant differences noted loss recorded for (P < 0.0001). microthread had crestal 0.42 +/- 0.27 mm; implants, 0.81 0.89 0.41 mm. Within limitations this study, part maintained level against functional better than without these two features.

参考文章(25)
Paul P. Binon, Implants and components: entering the new millennium. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. ,vol. 15, pp. 76- 94 ,(2000)
Young Kyu Shin, Sunjai Kim, Chong Hyun Han, Heoung Jae Chun, Seong Joo Heo, Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around implants with different neck designs after 1 year. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. ,vol. 21, pp. 789- 794 ,(2006)
Gotfredsen K, Karlsson U, Olsson C, Single-tooth replacement by osseointegrated Astra Tech dental implants: a 2-year report. International Journal of Prosthodontics. ,vol. 10, pp. 318- ,(1997)
Lee Kw, Jung Yc, Han Ch, A 1-year radiographic evaluation of marginal bone around dental implants. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. ,vol. 11, pp. 811- ,(1996)
Gabor Tepper, Robert Haas, Dieter Busenlechner, Nina Trinkl, Georg Watzek, Georg Watzak, Werner Zechner, Radiologic follow-up of peri-implant bone loss around machine-surfaced and rough-surfaced interforaminal implants in the mandible functionally loaded for 3 to 7 years. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. ,vol. 19, pp. 216- 221 ,(2004)
Tomas Albrektsson, Young-Taeg Sul, Carina Johansson, Which surface properties enhance bone response to implants? Comparison of oxidized magnesium, TiUnite, and Osseotite implant surfaces. International Journal of Prosthodontics. ,vol. 19, pp. 319- 328 ,(2006)
T Albrektsson, A R Eriksson, G Zarb, P Worthington, The Long-Term Efficacy of Currently Used Dental Implants: A Review and Proposed Criteria of Success International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. ,vol. 1, pp. 11- 25 ,(1986)
Stig Hansson, The implant neck: smooth or provided with retention elements. A biomechanical approach. Clinical Oral Implants Research. ,vol. 10, pp. 394- 405 ,(1999) , 10.1034/J.1600-0501.1999.100506.X
L. Class, H.-J. Wilke, S. Steinemann, The influence of various titanium surfaces on the interface shear strength between implants and bone Journal of Biomechanics. ,vol. 24, pp. 461- ,(1991) , 10.1016/0021-9290(91)90068-X