An empirical comparison of SNPs and microsatellites for parentage and kinship assignment in a wild sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) population.

作者: LORENZ HAUSER , MELISSA BAIRD , RAY HILBORN , LISA W. SEEB , JAMES E. SEEB

DOI: 10.1111/J.1755-0998.2010.02961.X

关键词:

摘要: Because of their high variability, microsatellites are still considered the marker choice for studies on parentage and kinship in wild populations. Nevertheless, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) becoming increasing popular many areas molecular ecology, owing to high-throughput, easy transferability between laboratories low genotyping error. An ongoing discussion concerns relative power SNPs compared microsatellites-that is, how SNP loci needed replace a panel microsatellites? Here, we evaluate assignment 80 (H(E) = 0.30, independent alleles) 11 0.85, 192 population about 400 sockeye salmon with two commonly used software packages (Cervus3, Colony2) and, only, newly developed (SNPPIT). Assignment success was higher than microsatellites, especially parent pairs, irrespective method used. Colony2 assigned larger proportion offspring at least one other methods, although Cervus SNPPIT detected more pairs. Identification full-sib groups without parental information from relatedness measures possible using both systems, explicit reconstruction such impossible because computation time. Our results confirm applicability analyses refute predictability number alleles.

参考文章(62)
Paul Bentzen, Todd R. Seamons, Thomas P. Quinn, DNA parentage analysis reveals inter-annual variation in selection: results from 19 consecutive brood years in steelhead trout Evolutionary Ecology Research. ,vol. 9, pp. 409- 431 ,(2007)
James F. Crow, Motoo Kimura, THE NUMBER OF ALLELES THAT CAN BE MAINTAINED IN A FINITE POPULATION. Genetics. ,vol. 49, pp. 725- 738 ,(1964) , 10.1093/GENETICS/49.4.725
ADAM G. JONES, CLAYTON M. SMALL, KIMBERLY A. PACZOLT, NICHOLAS L. RATTERMAN, A practical guide to methods of parentage analysis. Molecular Ecology Resources. ,vol. 10, pp. 6- 30 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1755-0998.2009.02778.X
DANY GARANT, LOESKE E. B. KRUUK, How to use molecular marker data to measure evolutionary parameters in wild populations. Molecular Ecology. ,vol. 14, pp. 1843- 1859 ,(2005) , 10.1111/J.1365-294X.2005.02561.X
T. C. MARSHALL, J. SLATE, L. E. B. KRUUK, J. M. PEMBERTON, Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations Molecular Ecology. ,vol. 7, pp. 639- 655 ,(1998) , 10.1046/J.1365-294X.1998.00374.X
Jinliang Wang, Informativeness of genetic markers for pairwise relationship and relatedness inference. Theoretical Population Biology. ,vol. 70, pp. 300- 321 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.TPB.2005.11.003
M G Bulmer, Inbreeding in the Great Tit. Heredity. ,vol. 30, pp. 313- 325 ,(1973) , 10.1038/HDY.1973.41
François Pompanon, Aurélie Bonin, Eva Bellemain, Pierre Taberlet, Genotyping errors: causes, consequences and solutions. Nature Reviews Genetics. ,vol. 6, pp. 847- 859 ,(2005) , 10.1038/NRG1707
PETER T. BOAG, PETER R. GRANT, Heritability of external morphology in Darwin's finches Nature. ,vol. 274, pp. 793- 794 ,(1978) , 10.1038/274793A0