Individual differences in transcranial electrical stimulation current density.

作者:

DOI: 10.7555/JBR.27.20130074

关键词:

摘要: Transcranial electrical stimulation (TCES) is effective in treating many conditions, but it has not been possible to accurately forecast current density within the complex anatomy of a given subject's head. We sought predict and verify TCES densities determine variability these distributions patient-specific models based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. Two experiments were performed. The first experiment estimated conductivity from MRIs compared results against actual measurements scalp surface 3 subjects. In second experiment, virtual electrodes placed scalps 18 subjects model simulated with 2 mA virtually applied stimulation. This procedure was repeated for 4 electrode locations. Current then calculated 75 brain regions. Comparison modeled measured external 1 yielded correlation r = .93. 2, individual differences greatest near (ten-fold common), found all regions brain. Sites that distant (e.g. hypothalamus) typically showed two-fold differences. MRI-based modeling can effectively brains. Significant variation occurs between same configuration. Individualized should be considered place 10-20 system when accurate needed.

参考文章(57)
J.-P. Lefaucheur, Methods of therapeutic cortical stimulation. Neurophysiologie Clinique-clinical Neurophysiology. ,vol. 39, pp. 1- 14 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.NEUCLI.2008.11.001
Ronald Pierson, Gregory Harris, Hans J. Johnson, Steve Dunn, Vincent A. Magnotta, Maximize uniformity summation heuristic (MUSH): a highly accurate simple method for intracranial delineation Proceedings of SPIE. ,vol. 7259, ,(2009) , 10.1117/12.812322
Stephanie Powell, Vincent A. Magnotta, Hans Johnson, Vamsi K. Jammalamadaka, Ronald Pierson, Nancy C. Andreasen, Registration and Machine Learning Based Automated Segmentation of Subcortical and Cerebellar Brain Structures NeuroImage. ,vol. 39, pp. 238- 247 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2007.05.063
Xin Zheng, David C. Alsop, Gottfried Schlaug, Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on human regional cerebral blood flow NeuroImage. ,vol. 58, pp. 26- 33 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2011.06.018
Ronald Pierson, Hans Johnson, Gregory Harris, Helen Keefe, Jane S. Paulsen, Nancy C. Andreasen, Vincent A. Magnotta, Fully automated analysis using BRAINS: AutoWorkup. NeuroImage. ,vol. 54, pp. 328- 336 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2010.06.047
Mark S. George, Ziad Nahas, Xiangbao Li, F. Andrew Kozel, Berry Anderson, Kaori Yamanaka, Jeong-Ho Chae, Milton J. Foust, Novel treatments of mood disorders based on brain circuitry (ECT, MST, TMS, VNS, DBS). Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry. ,vol. 7, pp. 293- 304 ,(2002) , 10.1053/SCNP.2002.35229
Jun-Feng Feng, Jing Liu, Xiu-Zhen Zhang, Lei Zhang, Ji-Yao Jiang, Jan Nolta, Min Zhao, Guided migration of neural stem cells derived from human embryonic stem cells by an electric field. Stem Cells. ,vol. 30, pp. 349- 355 ,(2012) , 10.1002/STEM.779
Elmar Frank, Martin Schecklmann, Michael Landgrebe, Julia Burger, Peter Kreuzer, Timm B. Poeppl, Tobias Kleinjung, Göran Hajak, Berthold Langguth, Treatment of chronic tinnitus with repeated sessions of prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation: outcomes from an open-label pilot study Journal of Neurology. ,vol. 259, pp. 327- 333 ,(2012) , 10.1007/S00415-011-6189-4
David B. MacDonald, Safety of intraoperative transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potential monitoring. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. ,vol. 19, pp. 416- 429 ,(2002) , 10.1097/00004691-200210000-00005
Shawn M. McClintock, Anna R. Brandon, Mustafa M. Husain, Robin B. Jarrett, A systematic review of the combined use of electroconvulsive therapy and psychotherapy for depression. Journal of Ect. ,vol. 27, pp. 236- 243 ,(2011) , 10.1097/YCT.0B013E3181FAAECA