Landmark estimation of survival and treatment effects in observational studies

作者: Layla Parast , Beth Ann Griffin

DOI: 10.1007/S10985-016-9358-Z

关键词:

摘要: Clinical studies aimed at identifying effective treatments to reduce the risk of disease or death often require long term follow-up participants in order observe a sufficient number events precisely estimate treatment effect. In such studies, observing outcome interest during may be difficult and high rates censoring observed which leads reduced power when applying straightforward statistical methods developed for time-to-event data. Alternative have been proposed take advantage auxiliary information that potentially improve efficiency estimating marginal survival testing Recently, Parast et al. (J Am Stat Assoc 109(505):384-394, 2014) landmark estimation procedure effects randomized clinical trial setting demonstrated significant gains could obtained by incorporating intermediate event as well baseline covariates. However, requires assumption potential outcomes each individual under control are independent group assignment is unlikely hold an observational study setting. this paper we develop use particular, incorporate inverse probability weights (IPTW) account selection bias on (pretreatment) We demonstrate consistent estimates can using IPTW there improved information. compare our those Kaplan-Meier estimator, original procedure, estimator. illustrate resulting reduction through simulation apply AIDS dataset examine effect previous antiretroviral therapy survival.

参考文章(69)
Peter C. Austin, The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios Statistics in Medicine. ,vol. 32, pp. 2837- 2849 ,(2007) , 10.1002/SIM.5705
Susan Murray, Anastasios A. Tsiatis, Using auxiliary time-dependent covariates to recover information in nonparametric testing with censored data. Lifetime Data Analysis. ,vol. 7, pp. 125- 141 ,(2001) , 10.1023/A:1011392622173
Kosuke Imai, David A van Dyk, Causal Inference with General Treatment Regimes: Generalizing the Propensity Score Journal of the American Statistical Association. ,vol. 99, pp. 854- 866 ,(2004) , 10.1198/016214504000001187
Kosuke Imai, Marc Ratkovic, Covariate balancing propensity score Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology). ,vol. 76, pp. 243- 263 ,(2014) , 10.1111/RSSB.12027
Laxmi Bhatta, Elise Klouman, Keshab Deuba, Rachana Shrestha, Deepak Kumar Karki, Anna Mia Ekstrom, Luai Awad Ahmed, None, Survival on antiretroviral treatment among adult HIV-infected patients in Nepal: a retrospective cohort study in far-western Region, 2006–2011 BMC Infectious Diseases. ,vol. 13, pp. 604- 604 ,(2013) , 10.1186/1471-2334-13-604
Birthe Lykke Thomsen, Niels Keiding, Douglas G. Altman, A note on the calculation of expected survival, illustrated by the survival of liver transplant patients Statistics in Medicine. ,vol. 10, pp. 733- 738 ,(1991) , 10.1002/SIM.4780100508
Takahiro Higashi, Paul G. Shekelle, John L. Adams, Caren J. Kamberg, Carol P. Roth, David H. Solomon, David B. Reuben, Lillian Chiang, Catherine H. MacLean, John T. Chang, Roy T. Young, Debra M. Saliba, Neil S. Wenger, Quality of care is associated with survival in vulnerable older patients. Annals of Internal Medicine. ,vol. 143, pp. 274- 281 ,(2005) , 10.7326/0003-4819-143-4-200508160-00008