Cochlear Implant Surgery.

作者: Sarah E. Mowry , Erika Woodson

DOI: 10.1001/JAMAOTO.2019.2274

关键词:

摘要: However, the majority of persons with hearing loss are not profoundly deaf and they have some remaining usable hearing. Encouraged by promising results in traditional cochlear implant patients improvements electrode design signal processing, investigators expanded indications for implantation. Now addition to completely patients, selected subjects residual eligible implantation modified electrodes. The approach involves preserving existing acoustic (low-frequency) an ear be implanted. Electrical stimulation is provided via a CI missing high frequencies improve speech understanding combined electric (A + E) prerequisite this form (ipsilateral A sufficient degree low frequency implanted ear. Most electrodes able achieve improved sound perception word while their (Ching et al., 1998; Hogan & Turner, 1998). listening condition using only A+E no aid contralateral referred as “hybrid mode”. these recipients benefit from ear, “combined This situation has potential recognition both quiet noise (Gstoettner 2006; Turner Cummings, 1999).

参考文章(72)
Daofeng Ni, Robert K. Shepherd, H.Lee Seldon, Shi-Ang Xu, Graeme M. Clark, Rodney E. Millard, Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I: Normal hearing kittens. Hearing Research. ,vol. 62, pp. 63- 81 ,(1992) , 10.1016/0378-5955(92)90203-Y
JORGE OTTE, HAROLD F. SCHUKNECHT, ALAN G. KERR, Clinical differentiation of conductive hearing loss. Laryngoscope. ,vol. 88, pp. 1378- 1380 ,(1978) , 10.1288/00005537-197808000-00002
Wai Na Yao, Christopher W. Turner, Bruce J. Gantz, Stability of low-frequency residual hearing in patients who are candidates for combined acoustic plus electric hearing. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research. ,vol. 49, pp. 1085- 1090 ,(2006) , 10.1044/1092-4388(2006/077)
David P. James, Hayden Eastwood, Rachael T. Richardson, Stephen J. O’Leary, Effects of Round Window Dexamethasone on Residual Hearing in a Guinea Pig Model of Cochlear Implantation Audiology and Neuro-otology. ,vol. 13, pp. 86- 96 ,(2008) , 10.1159/000111780
Christopher W. Turner, Bruce J. Gantz, Corina Vidal, Amy Behrens, Belinda A. Henry, Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. ,vol. 115, pp. 1729- 1735 ,(2004) , 10.1121/1.1687425
Jona Kronenberg, Lela Migirov, Wolf Dieter Baumgartner, The Suprameatal Approach in Cochlear Implant Surgery: Our Experience with 80 Patients ORL. ,vol. 64, pp. 403- 405 ,(2002) , 10.1159/000067576
Christopher W. Turner, Karolyn J. Cummings, Speech Audibility for Listeners With High-Frequency Hearing Loss American Journal of Audiology. ,vol. 8, pp. 47- 56 ,(1999) , 10.1044/1059-0889(1999/002)
J. Thomas Roland, Daniel M. Zeitler, Daniel Jethanamest, Tina C. Huang, Evaluation of the short hybrid electrode in human temporal bones. Otology & Neurotology. ,vol. 29, pp. 482- 488 ,(2008) , 10.1097/MAO.0B013E31816845EB
Cynthia A. Hogan, Christopher W. Turner, High-frequency audibility: Benefits for hearing-impaired listeners The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. ,vol. 104, pp. 432- 441 ,(1998) , 10.1121/1.423247