“Put the blame on…others!”: The battle of cyclists against pedestrians and car drivers at the urban environment. A cyclists’ perception study

摘要: Abstract The main hypothesis of the paper is that cyclists tend to blame primarily car drivers, for conflict events they have experienced with cars, but do not same intention pedestrians. For this purpose, 306 were interviewed through a revealed questionnaire survey and 64% had pedestrian whereas 55% car. From responses, two linear regression models developed, perceived responsibility considered as dependent variable. cycling–pedestrian model indicated who also accessibility, pedestrians incidents, compared possess Further, give less incidents occurred at sidewalks, crosswalks, etc. compare shared use paths. In addition, conflicts sidewalks crosswalks; places are priority. Finally, aged between 55 64 years old, giving incident, 25 39 years old. On other hand, cycling–car showed an illegal cyclist’s movement road segment can reduce by half when latter aggressive driving behavior. It was found cyclists, cycle than 1 h, so much drivers longer. prefer bicycle lane be located along instead sidewalk, accuse incident.