摘要: In this paper I defend the view that counterfactual thinking depends on our causal representation of world, and in sense, argue reasoning are tightly linked. offer some criticisms experimental evidence against Mandel's judgement dissociation theory (Mandel, 2003b), which claims functional independence between process selection context selection. experiments described, manipulated elements semantics task to show cases does not occur. Experiment 1, level description target event is a list generation rating task. 2 replicates 1 findings using an alternative coding system, whereas 3 same answer format. The results support picture understanding proposed by mental models.
unirioja.es参考文章(33)
David K. Lewis, Philosophical Papers: Volume I ,(1983)
Clark Glymour, Patricia W. Cheng, Causal Mechanism and Probability: A Normative Approach ,(1998)
D. Kahneman, A. Tversky, Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases ,(1974)
David R Mandel, Denis J Hilton, Patrizia Catellani, The Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking Routledge. pp. 183- 198 ,(2005) , 10.4324/9780203963784
Ned Hall, Laurie Paul, John Collins, Causation and counterfactuals MIT Press. ,(2004)
Judea Pearl, Causation, Action, and Counterfactuals Logic and Scientific Methods. pp. 355- 375 ,(1997) , 10.1007/978-94-017-0487-8_18
Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky, The simulation heuristic Cambridge University Press. pp. 201- 208 ,(1982) , 10.1017/CBO9780511809477.015
Christoph Hoerl, Teresa McCormack, Sarah R. Beck, Understanding Counterfactuals, Understanding Causation: Issues in Philosophy and Psychology Oxford University Press. ,(2011)
H. L. A. Hart, Tony Honoré, Causation in the law ,(1959)
Steven Sloman, Steven A Sloman, Causal Models: How People Think About the World and Its Alternatives ,(2009)